Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35802374›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2022

Effect of Physical Therapy vs Arthroscopic Partial Meniscectomy in People With Degenerative Meniscal Tears: Five-Year Follow-up of the ESCAPE Randomized Clinical Trial.

Julia C A Noorduyn, Victor A van de Graaf, Nienke W Willigenburg, Gwendolyne G M Scholten-Peeters, Esther J Kret, Rogier A van Dijk, Rachelle Buchbinder, Gillian A Hawker, Michel W Coppieters, Rudolf W Poolman and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled TrialEquivalence Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01850719 (Cost-effectiveness of Early Surgery Versus Conservative Treatment With Optional Delayed Meniscectomy in Older Patients. A Randomized Controlled Trial.), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01850719 nacompletednot on this map

Cost-effectiveness of Early Surgery Versus Conservative Treatment With Optional Delayed Meniscectomy in Older Patients. A Randomized Controlled Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorOnze Lieve Vrouwe GasthuisRan2013 to 2017Enrolled321ConditionsMeniscal TearArmsArthroscopic Partial Meniscectomy, Physical Therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. [Update on Meniscal Injury Treatment].Revista brasileira de ortopedia · 2025
    Article
  13. Update on Meniscal Injury Treatment.Revista brasileira de ortopedia · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The Role of Ultrasound in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Meniscal Injuries.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2024
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Julia C A NoorduynDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Joint Research, OLVG Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Victor A van de GraafDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Joint Research, OLVG Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Nienke W WilligenburgDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Joint Research, OLVG Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Gwendolyne G M Scholten-PeetersDepartment of Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Esther J KretDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Joint Research, OLVG Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Rogier A van DijkDepartment of Radiology, Isala, Zwolle, the Netherlands.
Rachelle BuchbinderDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash-Cabrini Department of Musculoskeletal Health and Clinical Epidemiology, Cabrini Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Gillian A HawkerDepartment of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Michel W CoppietersDepartment of Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Rudolf W PoolmanDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Joint Research, OLVG Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
ESCAPE Research Group
GGD Amsterdam · NLVrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NLCabrini Hospital · AUIsala · NLUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: There is a paucity of high-quality evidence about the long-term effects (ie, 3-5 years and beyond) of arthroscopic partial meniscectomy vs exercise-based physical therapy for patients with degenerative meniscal tears. Objectives: To compare the 5-year effectiveness of arthroscopic partial meniscectomy and exercise-based physical therapy on patient-reported knee function and progression of knee osteoarthritis in patients with a degenerative meniscal tear. Design, Setting, and Participants: A noninferiority, multicenter randomized clinical trial was conducted in the orthopedic departments of 9 hospitals in the Netherlands. A total of 321 patients aged 45 to 70 years with a degenerative meniscal tear participated. Data collection took place between July 12, 2013, and December 4, 2020. Interventions: Patients were randomly allocated to arthroscopic partial meniscectomy or 16 sessions of exercise-based physical therapy. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was patient-reported knee function (International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form (range, 0 [worst] to 100 [best]) during 5 years of follow-up based on the intention-to-treat principle, with a noninferiority threshold of 11 points. The secondary outcome was progression in knee osteoarthritis shown on radiographic images in both treatment groups. Results: Of 321 patients (mean [SD] age, 58 [6.6] years; 161 women [50.2%]), 278 patients (87.1%) completed the 5-year follow-up with a mean follow-up time of 61.8 months (range, 58.8-69.5 months). From baseline to 5-year follow-up, the mean (SD) improvement was 29.6 (18.7) points in the surgery group and 25.1 (17.8) points in the physical therapy group. The crude between-group difference was 3.5 points (95% CI, 0.7-6.3 points; P < .001 for noninferiority). The 95% CI did not exceed the noninferiority threshold of 11 points. Comparable rates of progression of radiographic-demonstrated knee osteoarthritis were noted between both treatments. Conclusions and Relevance: In this noninferiority randomized clinical trial after 5 years, exercise-based physical therapy remained noninferior to arthroscopic partial meniscectomy for patient-reported knee function. Physical therapy should therefore be the preferred treatment over surgery for degenerative meniscal tears. These results can assist in the development and updating of current guideline recommendations about treatment for patients with a degenerative meniscal tear. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01850719.

Indexed as

Knee InjuriesOsteoarthritis, KneeTibial Meniscus InjuriesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMeniscectomyMiddle AgedPhysical Therapy Modalities

Identifiers

PMID35802374
PMCPMC9270699
OpenAlexW4284962596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.