Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35802372›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2022

Evaluation of Rituximab for Induction and Maintenance Therapy in Patients 75 Years and Older With Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis.

Sara Thietart, Alexandre Karras, Jean-François Augusto, Carole Philipponnet, Pierre-Louis Carron, Xavier Delbrel, Rafik Mesbah, Gilles Blaison, Pierre Duffau, Khalil El Karoui and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Sara ThietartDepartment of Internal Medicine, National Referral Center for Rare Systemic Autoimmune Diseases, Hôpital Cochin, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
Alexandre KarrasDepartment of Nephrology, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Université de Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Jean-François AugustoDepartment of Nephrology, Dialysis, and Transplantation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Angers, France.
Carole PhilipponnetDepartment of Nephrology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Pierre-Louis CarronDepartment of Nephrology, Dialysis, and Transplantation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Grenoble-Alpes, Grenoble, France.
Xavier DelbrelDepartment of Internal Medicine, Centre Hospitalier de Pau, Pau, France.
Rafik MesbahDepartment of Nephrology, Centre Hospitalier, Boulogne-sur-Mer, France.
Gilles BlaisonDepartment of Internal Medicine, Louis Pasteur Colmar Hospital, Colmar, France.
Pierre DuffauDepartment of Internal Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Khalil El KarouiDepartment of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, Hôpital Henri-Mondor, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
Perrine SmetsDepartment of Internal Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Gabriel Montpied, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Jonathan LondonDepartment of Internal Medicine, National Referral Center for Rare Systemic Autoimmune Diseases, Hôpital Cochin, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
Luc MouthonDepartment of Internal Medicine, National Referral Center for Rare Systemic Autoimmune Diseases, Hôpital Cochin, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
Loïc GuillevinDepartment of Internal Medicine, National Referral Center for Rare Systemic Autoimmune Diseases, Hôpital Cochin, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
Benjamin TerrierDepartment of Internal Medicine, National Referral Center for Rare Systemic Autoimmune Diseases, Hôpital Cochin, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
Xavier PuéchalDepartment of Internal Medicine, National Referral Center for Rare Systemic Autoimmune Diseases, Hôpital Cochin, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
French Vasculitis Study Group
Université Paris Cité · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand · FRAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRCentre Hospitalier Compiègne-Noyon · FRCentre Hospitalier De Pau · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble · FRHôpital Cochin · FRSorbonne Université · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Older patients are underrepresented in studies of rituximab for the treatment of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis. Little is known about outcomes and adverse events associated with the use of rituximab therapy among patients 75 years and older with ANCA-associated vasculitis. Objective: To examine outcomes and adverse events associated with the use of rituximab therapy in patients 75 years and older with ANCA-associated vasculitis, specifically granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) or microscopic polyangiitis (MPA). Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter cohort study involved 93 patients 75 years and older with ANCA-associated vasculitis from 36 university and nonuniversity hospitals in France. Data were obtained from the French Vasculitis Study Group database between January 1, 2000, and July 1, 2018, and a call for observation sent to French Vasculitis Study Group members on June 6, 2019. Data analysis was performed from November 15 to December 31, 2021. Inclusion criteria included a diagnosis of GPA or MPA according to European Medicines Agency classification criteria and receipt of treatment with rituximab after age 75 years. Patients were excluded if they were missing relevant clinical or biological data. Data on race and ethnicity were not reported because inclusion of this information was not authorized by the ethics committee. Exposure: At least 1 infusion of rituximab as induction or maintenance therapy. Main Outcomes and Measures: Occurrence of remission, relapse, drug discontinuation, death, and serious infections (including types of serious infections). Results: Of 238 patients screened, 93 were included (median [IQR] age, 79.4 [76.7-83.1] years; 51 women [54.8%]); 52 patients (55.9%) had a diagnosis of GPA, and 41 (44.1%) had a diagnosis of MPA. Thirty patients (32.3%) received rituximab as induction therapy in combination with high-dose glucocorticoid regimens, 27 (29.0%) received rituximab as maintenance therapy, and 36 (38.7%) received rituximab as both induction and maintenance therapy. The median (IQR) follow-up was 2.3 (1.1-4.0) years. Among 66 patients who received rituximab as induction therapy, 57 (86.4%) achieved remission, and 2 (3.0%) experienced relapses. The incidence of serious infection was significantly higher when rituximab was used as induction therapy vs maintenance therapy (46.6 [95% CI, 24.8-79.7] per 100 patient-years vs 8.4 [95% CI, 3.8-15.9] per 100 patient-years; P = .004). Most infections (12 of 22 [54.5%]) were gram-negative bacterial infections. The incidence of death was 19.7 (95% CI, 7.2-42.9) per 100 patient-years among those who received rituximab as induction therapy and 5.3 (95% CI, 1.9-11.6) per 100 patient-years among those who received rituximab as maintenance therapy. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, rituximab therapy was associated with achievement and maintenance of remission in most patients 75 years and older with ANCA-associated vasculitis. The incidence of serious infections and death was high when rituximab was used as induction therapy in combination with high-dose glucocorticoid regimens but not when rituximab was used as maintenance therapy. Efforts might focus on reducing serious infections during the first months of therapy.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Antineutrophil CytoplasmicAnti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated VasculitisAgedCohort StudiesFemaleGlucocorticoidsHumansRecurrenceRituximabTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, Antineutrophil CytoplasmicGlucocorticoidsRituximab

Identifiers

PMID35802372
PMCPMC9270693
OpenAlexW4284958383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.