Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35802259›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastroenterology2022

Utility of artificial intelligence with deep learning of hematoxylin and eosin-stained whole slide images to predict lymph node metastasis in T1 colorectal cancer using endoscopically resected specimens; prediction of lymph node metastasis in T1 colorectal cancer.

Joo Hye Song, Yiyu Hong, Eun Ran Kim, Seok-Hyung Kim, Insuk Sohn

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastroenterology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. [Prognosis Analysis of Additional Surgical Treatment for High-Risk T1 Colorectal Cancer Patients After Endoscopic Resection].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joo Hye Song *Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea.
Yiyu Hong *Department of R&D Center, Arontier Co., Ltd, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Eun Ran KimDepartment of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea. er.kim@samsung.com.
Seok-Hyung KimDepartment of Pathology, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Insuk SohnDepartment of R&D Center, Arontier Co., Ltd, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Samsung Medical Center · KR

Funding

Samsung Medical Center #SMO1210071
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhen endoscopically resected specimens of early colorectal cancer (CRC) show high-risk features, surgery should be performed based on current guidelines because of the high-risk of lymph node metastasis (LNM). The aim of this study was to determine the utility of an artificial intelligence (AI) with deep learning (DL) of hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained endoscopic resection specimens without manual-pixel-level annotation for predicting LNM in T1 CRC. In addition, we assessed AI performance for patients with only submucosal (SM) invasion depth of 1000 to 2000 μm known to be difficult to predict LNM in clinical practice.

methodsH&E-stained whole slide images (WSIs) were scanned for endoscopic resection specimens of 400 patients who underwent endoscopic treatment for newly diagnosed T1 CRC with additional surgery. The area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve was used to determine the accuracy of AI for predicting LNM with a fivefold cross-validation in the training set and in a held-out test set.

resultsWe developed an AI model using a two-step attention-based DL approach without clinical features (AUC, 0.764). Incorporating clinical features into the model did not improve its prediction accuracy for LNM. Our model reduced unnecessary additional surgery by 15.1% more than using the current guidelines (67.4% vs. 82.5%). In patients with SM invasion depth of 1000 to 2000 μm, the AI avoided 16.1% of unnecessary additional surgery than using the JSCCR guidelines.

conclusionsOur study is the first to show that AI trained with DL of H&E-stained WSIs has the potential to predict LNM in T1 CRC using only endoscopically resected specimens with conventional histologic risk factors.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsDeep LearningArtificial IntelligenceEosine Yellowish-(YS)HematoxylinHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsEosine Yellowish-(YS)HematoxylinArtificial intelligenceLymph node metastasisPredictionT1 colorectal cancerWhole slide image

Identifiers

PMID35802259
OpenAlexW4284891742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.