ArticleJournal of fluorescence2022
Exploration of Pull-Push Effect for Novel Photovoltaic Dyes with A-π-D Design: A DFT/TD-DFT Investigation.
Article in Journal of fluorescence, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Systematic Computational Designing of Efficient Phenalene and Pyrene Based Derivatives to Tune the Optical and Nonlinear Optical Response.Journal of fluorescence · 2025Article
- Surface tailoring of porphyrinRSC advances · 2025Article
- Synthesis, characterization, computational and dyeing behavior of Cu(II) and Zn(II) metal complexes derived from azo-Schiff bases containing phenol derivatives.BMC chemistry · 2025Article
- Engineering of the Central Core on DBD-Based Materials with Improved Power-Conversion Efficiency by Using the DFT Approach.ACS omega · 2024Article
- Possible NLO response and electrical/charge transfer capabilities of natural anthraquinones as p-type organic semiconductors: a DFT approach.Journal of molecular modeling · 2024Article
- Structure-based screening of spJournal of molecular modeling · 2024Article
- DFT-guided structural modeling of end-group acceptors at Y123 core for sensitizers as high-performance organic solar dyes and NLO responses.Journal of molecular modeling · 2023Article
- Exploration of Pull-Push Effect for Novel Photovoltaic Dyes with A-π-D Design: A DFT/TD-DFT Investigation.Journal of fluorescence · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The π-rich versus π-poor units in 4,6-di(thiophen-2-yl)pyrimidine (DTB) alternating the π-backbone of solar cells dyes have been extended with a push-pull technique to lower their HOMO-LUMO energy gap and to increase Intramolecular Charge Transfer (ICT). Density functional theory was used to optimize the ground state molecular geometries of newly designed dyes (DTB1-DTB6). Time Dependent DFT (TD-DFT) was used to simulate the Uv-vis spectral values at the maximum absorbance values ranging between 481-535 nm. These values were red shifted from DTB value of experimental (333 nm) and theoretical (346 nm). however, their computed absorbance and fluorescence spectra revealed a bathochromic shift of them upon an increasing the solvent polarity. Different DFT functionals such as (B3LYP, CAM-B3LYP, B97XD, and APFD) were employed to choose their proper use Uv-visible analysis to reveal an unexpected coherence at the B3LYP level with experimental values. As a result, the B3LYP with most diffused basis sets of 6-31G + (d,p) were used for further calculations. The parameters of Global Chemical reactivities revealed that all the dyes had a softer nature with their softness value range of 0.27-0.41. their Ionization Potentials (IP) ranged between 6.21-8.10 eV to comply that the new dyes had good electron donating potentials. With a good electron injection potential of -1.47-1.74 eV, aluminum can be the best electrode, while Au is excellent towards a hole injection operation which had the potential range of 1.79-3.68 eV. For Natural Bond Orbital (NBO) assessment, (N14)LP → (F16-F28)π* with stabilization energy of 42.55 kcal/mol was noted for DTB4. Their Second order hyperpolarizability [Formula: see text] values as their Nonlinear Optical (NLO) response ranged between 59.16-232.11 debye-angstrom
Indexed as
Identifiers
35802211What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.