Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35801904›Full record

ReviewPerspectives in public health2022

System resilience and neighbourhood action on social determinants of health inequalities: an English Case Study.

J Popay, H Kaloudis, L Heaton, B Barr, E Halliday, V Holt, K Khan, A Porroche-Escudero, A Ring, G Sadler and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Perspectives in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Resilience and Aging Among Black Gay and Bisexual Older Men.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

J PopayProfessor, Division of Health Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
H KaloudisSenior Research Associate, Division of Health Research, Lancaster University, Bailrigg, Lancaster LA1 4YE, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0606-6292
L HeatonSenior Manager CLAHRC Legacy Project, Division of Health Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
B BarrProfessor, Department of Public Health, Policy and Systems, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
E HallidaySenior Research Fellow, Division of Health Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
V HoltSenior Research Associate, Division of Health Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
K KhanSenior Research Associate, Division of Health Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
A Porroche-EscuderoSenior Research Associate, Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
A RingResearch Associate, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
G SadlerSenior Research Associate, Division of Health Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
G SimpsonResearch Fellow, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
F WardSenior Research Associate, Division of Health Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
P WheelerEPBHC Theme Manager, Division of Health Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThis article seeks to make the case for a new approach to understanding and nurturing resilience as a foundation for effective place-based co-produced local action on social and health inequalities.

methodsA narrative review of literature on

resultsA difference-in-difference analysis of household survey data showed a statistically significant increase of 7.5% (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.6 to 13.5) in the percentage of residents reporting that they felt able to influence local decision-making in the NFLs relative to the residents in comparator areas, but no effect attributable to the NRP in other evaluative measures. The analysis of participant interviews identified beneficial impacts of the NRP in five resilience domains: social connectivity, cultural coherence, local decision-making, economic activity, and the local environment.

conclusionOur findings support the need for a shift away from interventions that seek solely to enhance the resilience of lay communities to interventions that recognise resilience as a whole systems phenomenon. Systemic approaches to resilience can provide the underpinning foundation for effective co-produced local action on social and health inequalities, but they require intensive relational work by all participating system players.

Indexed as

Residence CharacteristicsSocial Determinants of HealthHumansPublic HealthSocioeconomic FactorsVulnerable Populationscollective actioncommunity controlneighbourhood resilienceplace-based public healthsocial determinants of health inequalities

Identifiers

PMID35801904
PMCPMC9284076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.