Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35801678›Full record

ArticleThe journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research2022

Analysis on pregnancy outcomes and risk factors of cervical polypectomy during the first and second trimester pregnancy.

Yu-Luan Huang, Rui-Zhe Chen, Fang Le

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pregnancy outcomes and risk factors of decidual polyps in the first trimester after fresh cycle embryo transfer.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yu-Luan HuangWomen's Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Rui-Zhe ChenWomen's Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5537-0082
Fang LeWomen's Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6654-3329
Women's Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University · CN

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province LGD19H040001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo evaluate the risk factors of miscarriage in patients attempted cervical polypectomy during the first and second trimester pregnancy.

methodsPregnant women with singleton infants who underwent cervical polypectomy during the first and second trimester between January 2013 and May 2019 were investigated. The study retrospectively reviewed the clinical features and pregnancy outcomes after cervical polypectomy. A multivariable regression was performed to predict the risk factors of miscarriage.

resultsA total of 307 pregnant females were eventually included in our study. Twenty-seven patients (8.8%, 27/307) had a miscarriage before 28 weeks, 37 patients (12.1%, 37/307) had a preterm delivery. After univariate analysis, we found that the presence of decidual polyps and vaginal bleeding after polypectomy were the risk factors for miscarriage. Moreover, the incidence of miscarriage was significantly higher in the patients with decidual polyps than in those with endocervical polyps (14.9% vs. 5.6%, p = 0.010).

conclusionsThe most suitable hemostasis method should be taken in the cervical polypectomy during pregnancy. The risk of miscarriage associated with polypectomy during pregnancy is higher in females with decidual polyps. If decidual polyps are highly suspected and they do not cause excessive vaginal bleeding and can be ruled out the possibility of malignancy, conservative treatment may lead to a better outcome.

Indexed as

Abortion, SpontaneousPolypsFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyPregnancy OutcomePregnancy Trimester, FirstPregnancy Trimester, SecondRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsUterine Hemorrhagecervical polypdeducial polypmiscarriagepolypectomypreterm delivery

Identifiers

PMID35801678
PMCPMC13469927
OpenAlexW4284958067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.