Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35801582›Full record

ArticleBone & joint open2022

Emergency department visits following total joint arthroplasty: do revisions present a higher burden?

Vivek Singh, Utkarsh Anil, Mark Kurapatti, Joseph X Robin, Ran Schwarzkopf, Joshua C Rozell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bone & joint open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Vivek SinghDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2450-1785
Utkarsh AnilDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1807-1926
Mark KurapattiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8121-9439
Joseph X RobinDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA.
Ran SchwarzkopfDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0681-7014
Joshua C RozellDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0556-0077

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsAlthough readmission has historically been of primary interest, emergency department (ED) visits are increasingly a point of focus and can serve as a potentially unnecessary gateway to readmission. This study aims to analyze the difference between primary and revision total joint arthroplasty (TJA) cases in terms of the rate and reasons associated with 90-day ED visits.

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent TJA from 2011 to 2021 at a single, large, tertiary urban institution. Patients were separated into two cohorts based on whether they underwent primary or revision TJA (rTJA). Outcomes of interest included ED visit within 90-days of surgery, as well as reasons for ED visit and readmission rate. Multivariable logistic regressions were performed to compare the two groups while accounting for all statistically significant demographic variables.

resultsOverall, 28,033 patients were included, of whom 24,930 (89%) underwent primary and 3,103 (11%) underwent rTJA. The overall rate of 90-day ED visits was significantly lower for patients who underwent primary TJA in comparison to those who underwent rTJA (3.9% vs 7.0%; p < 0.001). Among those who presented to the ED, the readmission rate was statistically lower for patients who underwent primary TJA compared to rTJA (23.5% vs 32.1%; p < 0.001).

conclusionED visits present a significant burden to the healthcare system. Patients who undergo rTJA are more likely to present to the ED within 90 days following surgery compared to primary TJA patients. However, among patients in both cohorts who visited the ED, three-quarters did not require readmission. Future efforts should aim to develop cost-effective and patient-centred interventions that can aid in reducing preventable ED visits following TJA. Cite this article:

Indexed as

chi-squared testEconomic burdenEmergency departmentmedical comorbiditiesMultivariable logistic regressionsPrimary TJArevision surgeryRevision TJArevision total joint arthroplastyswellingtotal joint arthroplastyTotal joint arthroplastytotal knee arthroplasty (TKA)t-testwound

Identifiers

PMID35801582
PMCPMC9350702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.