Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35801562›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2022

Pseudofinder: Detection of Pseudogenes in Prokaryotic Genomes.

Mitchell J Syberg-Olsen, Arkadiy I Garber, Patrick J Keeling, John P McCutcheon, Filip Husnik

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 84 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
84citing papers in PubMed
9.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

84 citing papers in PubMed, 123 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A human-associatediScience · 2026
    Article
  9. A Compact Closed Genome ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Genomic Characterization of aVeterinary sciences · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

24 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Mitchell J Syberg-OlsenDepartment of Botany, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Arkadiy I GarberDivision of Biological Sciences, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, USA.
Patrick J KeelingDepartment of Botany, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
John P McCutcheonDivision of Biological Sciences, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, USA.
Filip HusnikDepartment of Botany, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
University of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Montana · USOkinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prokaryotic genomes are usually densely packed with intact and functional genes. However, in certain contexts, such as after recent ecological shifts or extreme population bottlenecks, broken and nonfunctional gene fragments can quickly accumulate and form a substantial fraction of the genome. Identification of these broken genes, called pseudogenes, is a critical step for understanding the evolutionary forces acting upon, and the functional potential encoded within, prokaryotic genomes. Here, we present Pseudofinder, an open-source software dedicated to pseudogene identification and analysis in bacterial and archaeal genomes. We demonstrate that Pseudofinder's multi-pronged, reference-based approach can detect a wide variety of pseudogenes, including those that are highly degraded and typically missed by gene-calling pipelines, as well newly formed pseudogenes containing only one or a few inactivating mutations. Additionally, Pseudofinder can detect genes that lack inactivating substitutions but experiencing relaxed selection. Implementation of Pseudofinder in annotation pipelines will allow more precise estimations of the functional potential of sequenced microbes, while also generating new hypotheses related to the evolutionary dynamics of bacterial and archaeal genomes.

Indexed as

Genome, ArchaealPseudogenesBacteriaProkaryotic CellsSoftwareannotationarchaeabacteriadN/dSgenomepredictionpseudogene

Identifiers

PMID35801562
PMCPMC9336565
OpenAlexW4284889270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.