Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35801239›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2022

An Explainable AI Approach for the Rapid Diagnosis of COVID-19 Using Ensemble Learning Algorithms.

Houwu Gong, Miye Wang, Hanxue Zhang, Md Fazla Elahe, Min Jin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Houwu GongDepartment of Software Engineering, College of Computer Science and Electronic Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha, China.
Miye WangEngineering Research Center of Medical Information Technology, Ministry of Education, West China Hospital, Chengdu, China.
Hanxue ZhangDepartment of Software Engineering, College of Computer Science and Electronic Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha, China.
Md Fazla ElaheDepartment of Software Engineering, College of Computer Science and Electronic Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha, China.
Min JinDepartment of Software Engineering, College of Computer Science and Electronic Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Artificial intelligence-based disease prediction models have a greater potential to screen COVID-19 patients than conventional methods. However, their application has been restricted because of their underlying black-box nature. Objective: To addressed this issue, an explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) approach was developed to screen patients for COVID-19. Methods: A retrospective study consisting of 1,737 participants (759 COVID-19 patients and 978 controls) admitted to San Raphael Hospital (OSR) from February to May 2020 was used to construct a diagnosis model. Finally, 32 key blood test indices from 1,374 participants were used for screening patients for COVID-19. Four ensemble learning algorithms were used: random forest (RF), adaptive boosting (AdaBoost), gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost). Feature importance from the perspective of the clinical domain and visualized interpretations were illustrated by using local interpretable model-agnostic explanations (LIME) plots. Results: The GBDT model [area under the curve (AUC): 86.4%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.821-0.907] outperformed the RF model (AUC: 85.7%; 95% CI 0.813-0.902), AdaBoost model (AUC: 85.4%; 95% CI 0.810-0.899), and XGBoost model (AUC: 84.9%; 95% CI 0.803-0.894) in distinguishing patients with COVID-19 from those without. The cumulative feature importance of lactate dehydrogenase, white blood cells, and eosinophil counts was 0.145, 0.130, and 0.128, respectively. Conclusions: Ensemble machining learning (ML) approaches, mainly GBDT and LIME plots, are efficient for screening patients with COVID-19 and might serve as a potential tool in the auxiliary diagnosis of COVID-19. Patients with higher WBC count, higher LDH level, or higher EOT count, were more likely to have COVID-19.

Indexed as

COVID-19AlgorithmsArtificial IntelligenceHumansMachine LearningRetrospective Studiesartificial intelligenceCOVID-19disease predictionensemble learningexplainable

Identifiers

PMID35801239
PMCPMC9253566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.