ArticleFrontiers in public health2022
An Explainable AI Approach for the Rapid Diagnosis of COVID-19 Using Ensemble Learning Algorithms.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- AI-Based Models for Risk Prediction in MASLD: A Systematic Review.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Pooled it
- A benchmark study of vision and pathology foundation models for computational pathology.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Constructing machine learning-based risk prediction model for osteoarthritis in population aged 45 and above: NHANES 2011-2018.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Neuroimaging of Alzheimer's Disease.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Article
- Development and application of explainable artificial intelligence using machine learning classification for long-term facial nerve function after vestibular schwannoma surgery.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2025Article
- Extracting a COVID-19 signature from a multi-omic dataset.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- From COVID-19 to monkeypox: a novel predictive model for emerging infectious diseases.BioData mining · 2024Article
- Adversarial regularized autoencoder graph neural network for microbe-disease associations prediction.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Predicting dyslipidemia incidence: unleashing machine learning algorithms on Lifestyle Promotion Project data.BMC public health · 2024Article
- A tree-based explainable AI model for early detection of Covid-19 using physiological data.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024Article
- Artificial intelligence for diagnosis of mild-moderate COVID-19 using haematological markers.Annals of medicine · 2023Article
- Risk factors and drug discovery for cognitive impairment in type 2 diabetes mellitus using artificial intelligence interpretation and graph neural networks.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Article
- Graph neural network and multi-data heterogeneous networks for microbe-disease prediction.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Artificial intelligence-based disease prediction models have a greater potential to screen COVID-19 patients than conventional methods. However, their application has been restricted because of their underlying black-box nature. Objective: To addressed this issue, an explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) approach was developed to screen patients for COVID-19. Methods: A retrospective study consisting of 1,737 participants (759 COVID-19 patients and 978 controls) admitted to San Raphael Hospital (OSR) from February to May 2020 was used to construct a diagnosis model. Finally, 32 key blood test indices from 1,374 participants were used for screening patients for COVID-19. Four ensemble learning algorithms were used: random forest (RF), adaptive boosting (AdaBoost), gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost). Feature importance from the perspective of the clinical domain and visualized interpretations were illustrated by using local interpretable model-agnostic explanations (LIME) plots. Results: The GBDT model [area under the curve (AUC): 86.4%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.821-0.907] outperformed the RF model (AUC: 85.7%; 95% CI 0.813-0.902), AdaBoost model (AUC: 85.4%; 95% CI 0.810-0.899), and XGBoost model (AUC: 84.9%; 95% CI 0.803-0.894) in distinguishing patients with COVID-19 from those without. The cumulative feature importance of lactate dehydrogenase, white blood cells, and eosinophil counts was 0.145, 0.130, and 0.128, respectively. Conclusions: Ensemble machining learning (ML) approaches, mainly GBDT and LIME plots, are efficient for screening patients with COVID-19 and might serve as a potential tool in the auxiliary diagnosis of COVID-19. Patients with higher WBC count, higher LDH level, or higher EOT count, were more likely to have COVID-19.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.