Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35801132›Full record

SynthesisCardiovascular therapeutics2022

The Effects of High-Intensity Interval Training on Exercise Capacity and Prognosis in Heart Failure and Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Cuihua Wang, Jun Xing, Baoli Zhao, Yahui Wang, Lizhuang Zhang, Yebo Wang, Mingqi Zheng, Gang Liu

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Cardiovascular therapeutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
18.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cuihua WangRehabilitation Medicine Department, The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Jun XingRehabilitation Medicine Department, The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Baoli ZhaoRehabilitation Medicine Department, The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Yahui WangRehabilitation Medicine Department, The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Lizhuang ZhangRehabilitation Medicine Department, The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Yebo WangRehabilitation Medicine Department, The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Mingqi ZhengDepartment of Cardiology, The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3300-1822
Gang LiuDepartment of Cardiology, The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4239-0655
Hebei Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study is to compare the effects of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) versus moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) on exercise capacity and several prognostic markers in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and heart failure (HF). Methods: This systematic review is registered on the INPLASY website (number: INPLASY202080112). We conducted a comprehensive search in eight databases of literature before September 13, 2019. Trials comparing HIIT and MICT in participants with CAD or HF aged 52-78 years were included. Exercise capacity (peak oxygen consumption (peak VO Results: A total of 15 studies were included comprising 664 patients, 50% of which were male, with an average age of 60.3 ± 13.2 years. For patients with CAD, HIIT significantly improved peak VO Conclusions: High-intensity interval training is an effective therapy for improving peak VO

Indexed as

Coronary Artery DiseaseHeart FailureHigh-Intensity Interval TrainingAgedExercise ToleranceFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOxygen ConsumptionPrognosisStroke VolumeVentricular Function, Left

Identifiers

PMID35801132
PMCPMC9203221
OpenAlexW4285019448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.