ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2022
Codon Usage of Hepatitis E Viruses: A Comprehensive Analysis.
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Codon usage bias of low-risk human papillomavirus types 6 and 11.Antonie van Leeuwenhoek · 2025Article
- Comprehensive analysis of the codon usage patterns in the polyprotein coding sequences of the honeybee viruses.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
- Codon usage bias analysis of the gene encoding NADArchives of microbiology · 2023Article
- Comprehensive analysis of codon bias in 13Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Sign of APOBEC editing, purifying selection, frameshift, and in-frame nonsense mutations in the microevolution of lumpy skin disease virus.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hepatitis E virus (HEV) is an emerging zoonotic pathogen with multiple species and genotypes, which may be classified into human, animal, and zoonotic HEV. Codon usage bias of HEV remained unclear. This study aims to characterize the codon usage of HEV and elucidate the main drivers influencing the codon usage bias. A total of seven HEV genotypes, HEV-1 (human HEV), HEV-3 and HEV-4 (zoonotic HEV), HEV-8, HEV-B, HEV-C1, and HEV-C2 (emerging animal HEV), were included in the study. Complete coding sequences, ORF1, ORF2, and ORF3, were accordingly obtained in the GenBank. Except for HEV-8, the other six genotypes tended to use codons ending in G/C. Based on the analysis of relatively synonymous codon usage (RSCU) and principal component analysis (PCA), codon usage bias was determined for HEV genotypes. Codon usage bias differed widely across human, zoonotic, and animal HEV genotypes; furthermore, it varied within certain genotypes such as HEV-4, HEV-8, and HEV-C1. In addition, dinucleotide abundance revealed that HEV was affected by translation selection to form a unique dinucleotide usage pattern. Moreover, parity rule 2 analysis (PR2), effective codon number (ENC)-plot, and neutrality analysis were jointly performed. Natural selection played a leading role in forming HEV codon usage bias, which was predominant in HEV-1, HEV-3, HEV-B and HEV-C1, while affected HEV-4, HEV-8, and HEV-C2 in combination with mutation pressure. Our findings may provide insights into HEV evolution and codon usage bias.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.