Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35800906›Full record

ArticleActa informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH2022

Impact of Reduced Acquisition Time on Bone Single-photon Emission Computed Tomography Images in Oncology Patients.

Nusret Salkica, Amela Begic, Sandra Zubovic, Sejla Ceric, Amila Basic, Adnan Sehic, Fuad Julardzija, Enis Tinjak

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nusret SalkicaClinic for Nuclear Medicine, Clinical Center of Sarajevo University, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Amela BegicClinic for Nuclear Medicine, Clinical Center of Sarajevo University, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Sandra ZubovicRadiology Clinic, Clinical Center of Sarajevo University, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Sejla CericClinic for Nuclear Medicine, Clinical Center of Sarajevo University, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Amila BasicClinic for Nuclear Medicine, Clinical Center of Sarajevo University, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Adnan SehicDepartment for Radiology Technology, Faculty of Health Studies, University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Fuad JulardzijaDepartment for Radiology Technology, Faculty of Health Studies, University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Enis TinjakDepartment for Radiotherapy, Oncology Clinic, Clinical Center of Sarajevo University, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
University of Sarajevo · BA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The use of resolution recovery (RR) in bone and myocardial perfusion imaging is becoming increasingly popular in nuclear medicine departments. RR produces reconstructed images that show improved spatial resolution and signal-to-noise ratio compared with conventional single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) images. Objective: To evaluate the impact of the ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM) RR modality on preserving noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) for short SPECT acquisition. Methods: This prospective study was conducted on 80 patients. Full SPECT acquisition was performed as a standardized protocol, while reduced acquisition was achieved with the Poisson resampling method. Noise, SNR, and CNR were measured for different reconstruction parameters for the same image levels. The impact of surface area and body mass index was also measured for the same reconstruction parameters. Results: The results show significantly higher SNR and CNR for the Evolution for Bone protocol compared to the other two reconstruction protocols for full and reduced SPECT acquisition. With the shortening of the SPECT acquisition, an increase in the value of noise was recorded. SNR and CNR decreased with the reduction in SPECT acquisition. Conclusion: The Evolution for Bone protocol for all three analyzed acquisition protocols had the lowest noise values. The highest SNR and CNR were recorded in the Evolution for Bone protocol for the three acquisition protocols and SPECT acquisition time can be reduced from 20 to 10 min for bone SPECT.

Indexed as

CNROSEMRRSNRSPECT

Identifiers

PMID35800906
PMCPMC9226760
OpenAlexW4226092492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.