ArticleCureus2022
Exploring the Experience of Breastfeeding Among Working Mothers at Healthcare Facility in Saudi Arabia: A Qualitative Approach.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Applying the theory of planned behavior to examine breastfeeding determinants in countries of the Gulf Cooperation Council: a systematic review.International breastfeeding journal · 2025Pooled it
- Influence of Healthcare Worker Training on Support for Exclusive Breastfeeding: A Systematic Review.International journal of women's health · 2026Review
- Determinants of High Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy among Nursing Mothers in Najran, Saudi Arabia.Nutrients · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBreastfeeding has both short- and long-term benefits for infants, mothers, the environment, healthcare costs, and wider society. In Saudi Arabia, breastfeeding has undergone a considerable decline in recent decades due to population changes and developing socioeconomic status. Limited research studies have explored the relationship between work and breastfeeding in Saudi Arabia. Nevertheless, most research has mentioned employment as the factor having the largest effect on breastfeeding in Saudi Arabia. PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to explore the factors that influence breastfeeding among working mothers in a tertiary hospital.
methodsUsing a phenomenological qualitative design, nine working women were recruited through purposive sampling at King Fahad Medical City (KFMC), Saudi Arabia in 2019. A semi-structured interview of 30-50 min was conducted with each participant. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the data.
resultsMost women talked about the difficulties of combining breastfeeding with work, which resulted in the early discontinuance of breastfeeding before six months. The findings show that the key factors that affect breastfeeding include maternal attributes such as knowledge about breastfeeding, prenatal decisions, and mothers' conflicting priorities, as well as the availability of social and workplace support. These influenced whether working women in healthcare settings in Saudi Arabia were able to continue breastfeeding while employed.
conclusionThis study highlights the importance of issues and problems faced by working mothers throughout postpartum. Inventive solutions need to be developed to facilitate breastfeeding in the work environment. This will give working women the option to breastfeed for a longer period to improve the health of both themselves and their babies. The availability of a private place and support from employers to utilise the institutional policy will enable working women to continue breastfeeding after returning to work.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.