ArticleCureus2022
Demographic and Geospatial Analysis of Buprenorphine and Methadone Prescription Rates.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Observational
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background The medical community continues to seek to understand both the causes and consequences of opioid use disorder (OUD). The recent 2019 public release of the Automation of Reports and Consolidated Orders System (ARCOS) database from the years 2006 to 2012 provides a unique opportunity to analyze a critical period of the opioid epidemic with unprecedented data granularity. Objectives This study aims to use the ARCOS dataset to (1) determine significant contributory variables to opioid overdose death rates, (2) determine significant contributory variables to the relative prescription of buprenorphine and methadone, and (3) evaluate the existence of statistically significant geospatial clusters in buprenorphine and methadone prescription rates. Methods This study utilizes multiple databases, including the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Wide-ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research (WONDER), the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) prescription drug data, and the United States (US) Census demographics, to examine the relationship between the different treatments of OUD. Linear regressions are used to determine significant contributory factors in overdose rate and the buprenorphine-to-methadone ratio. Geospatial analysis is used to identify geographic clusters in opioid overdoses and treatment patterns. Results Methadone prescriptions, racial demographics, and poverty were found to significantly correspond to opioid overdose death rates (p < 0.05). Buprenorphine prescriptions were not found to be significant (p = 0.20). Opioid overdoses, metro character, racial categorization, and education were found to significantly correspond to the ratio of buprenorphine to methadone prescribed (p < 0.05). Cluster analysis demonstrated different geospatial distributions in the prescriptions of buprenorphine and methadone (p < 0.05). Conclusion Historically, methadone prescriptions have been higher in areas with high overdose rates. Buprenorphine and methadone prescribing patterns have historically demonstrated different geographic trends.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.