ArticleCureus2022
Collateral Impact on Patients of Liver Diseases in the Second COVID-19 Wave: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- COVID-19: Has the Liver Been Spared?International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Patients with End-Stage Liver Disease: One Virus-A Plethora of Consequences.Journal of clinical and experimental hepatologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background The second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in India started in April 2021. This necessitated a change in focus from chronic ailments. This wave lasted till May 2021. Its impact on liver disease patients without COVID-19 infection has not been analyzed. Methods Records of liver disease patients from the Institute database admitted from April to May 2021 were compared with that from April to May 2019 i.e., prior to the pandemic. The primary outcome was a comparison of in-hospital mortality rates. Secondary outcomes were a comparison of 30 and 90-day readmission rates and liver transplantation rates. Results Seven hundred and seventy-one patients in April-May 2019 (group 1) and 545 patients in April-May 2021 (group 2) were analyzed. Patients in group 2 were sicker with higher PT (INR), urea, creatinine, CTP, and MELD score and low serum sodium, albumin, and platelet count with a higher prevalence of variceal bleed, hepatic encephalopathy, and acute kidney injury. There was higher mortality in group 2 (128/545; 23.5%) than group 1 (124/ 771;16.1%), OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.2 - 2.1, p<0.01. 30 day readmission rate was numerically higher in group1; 18.3% vs 16.9%, p=0.5. The 31-90 day readmission rate was higher in group 1; 29.4% vs 16.9%, p<0.01. There was no significant difference in the number of patients undergoing liver transplantation in two groups, 19 in group 1 and 14 in group 2 (p=0.90). Conclusion The second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic had a significant collateral impact on liver disease patients even without causing infection in them. Patients were sicker at the time of admission with higher mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.