ArticleCureus2022
Incidence and Outcomes of Transplant of Infected Donor Corneal Tissues in a Tertiary Hospital in Saudi Arabia.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- An Overview of Corneal Transplantation in the Past Decade.Clinics and practice · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe aim of this study is to assess donor rim culture results and predict ocular infections after corneal transplantation to determine the relationship between positive corneoscleral rim cultures and post-keratoplasty infection.
designThis is a retrospective study.
methodsThe microbiology results of positive donor rim culture and clinical outcomes of all contaminated grafts at Dhahran Eye Specialist Hospital (DESH) in the Eastern Region of Saudi Arabia between October 2016 and February 2020 were reviewed.
resultsA total of 684 corneal transplantation procedures were performed at DESH during this period. Routine donor rim cultures were done for all cases with six positive cases (0.88%). There were five positive fungal donor rim cultures (0.73%), and one corneal rim was positive for both bacterial and fungal cultures (0.15%). Among these six patients, two patients (33.33%) who received graft positive with candida developed an infection. Both cases required further interventions but were unsuccessful and eventually ended up with re-grafting.
conclusionIn the sample collected, positive fungal contamination was more frequent than bacterial contamination, and the incidence of bacterial infection is relatively low compared to that of fungal infection due to contaminated grafts. Despite the limitations of our study, we support routine corneoscleral rim culture and to start prophylactic antifungal treatment in response to positive donor fungal rim culture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.