Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35800805›Full record

ArticleCureus2022

The Development and Initial End-Point User Feedback of a 3D-Printed Adult Proximal Tibia IO Simulator.

Mithusa Sivanathan, Julia Micallef, Krystina M Clarke, Bruno Gino, Shitji Joshi, Sandy Abdo, Dania Buttu, Marvin Mnaymneh, Samyah Siraj, Andrei Torres and 4 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mithusa SivanathanHealth Sciences, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, CAN.
Julia MicallefHealth Sciences, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, CAN.
Krystina M ClarkeHealth Sciences, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, CAN.
Bruno GinoEmergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, CAN.
Shitji JoshiEngineering and Applied Science, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, CAN.
Sandy AbdoHealth Sciences, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, CAN.
Dania ButtuHealth Sciences, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, CAN.
Marvin MnaymnehEducation, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, CAN.
Samyah SirajHealth Sciences, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, CAN.
Andrei TorresComputer Science, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, CAN.
Gordon BrockFamily Practice, Centre De Sante Temiscaming, Temiscaming, CAN.
Dale ButtonParamedicine, Durham College, Oshawa, CAN.
Carla PereiraAllergy and Immunology, Uberlândia Medical Centre (UMC), Uberlândia, BRA.
Adam DubrowskiHealth Sciences, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, CAN.
University of Ontario Institute of Technology · CADurham College · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intraosseous infusion (IO) remains an underutilized technique for obtaining vascular access in adults, despite its potentially life-saving benefits in trauma patients. In rural and remote areas, shortage of training equipment and human capacity (i.e., simulators) are the main contributors to the shortage of local training courses aiming at the development and maintenance of IO skills. Specifically, current training equipment options available for trainees include commercially available simulators, which are often expensive, or animal tissues, which lack human anatomical features that are necessary for optimal learning and pose logistical and ethical issues related to practice on live animals. Three-dimensional (3D) printing provides the means to create cost-effective, anatomically correct simulators for practicing IO where existing simulators may be difficult to access, especially in remote areas. This technical report aims to describe the development of maxSIMIO, a 3D-printed adult proximal tibia IO simulator, and present feedback on the design features from a clinical co-design team consisting of 18 end-point users.  Overall, the majority of the feedback was positive and highlighted that the maxSIMIO simulator was helpful for learning and developing the IO technique. The majority of the clinical team responders also agreed that the simulator was more anatomically accurate compared to other simulators they have used in the past. Finally, the survey results indicated that on average, the simulator is acceptable as a training tool. Notable suggestions for improvement included increasing the stability of the individual parts of the model (such as tightening the skin and securing the bones), enhancing the anatomical accuracy of the experience (such as adding a fibula), making the bones harder, increasing the size of the patella, making it more modular (to minimize costs related to maintenance), and improving the anatomical positioning of the knee joint (i.e., slightly bent in the knee joint). In summary, the clinical team, located in rural and remote areas in Canada, found the 3D-printed simulator to be a functional tool for practicing the intraosseous technique. The outcome of this report supports the use of this cost-effective simulator for simulation-based medical education for remote and rural areas anywhere in the world.

Indexed as

3d-printingadditive manufacturingemergency medicineintraosseous infusioniopsychomotor skillssimulation-based medical educationsimulatorthree-dimensional (3d) printingtraining

Identifiers

PMID35800805
PMCPMC9246437
OpenAlexW4281993506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.