ArticleCureus2022
Changes in the Treatment for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest During the Initial Stage of the COVID-19 Outbreak in Japan.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Drivers and Outcomes of Engagement in Non-Formal Special Interest Groups Among Japanese Emergency Physicians: An Activity Theory Analysis.AEM education and training · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionCardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic carries an added risk of COVID-19 infection for healthcare workers. However, because of the shortage of medical supplies and limited evidence of COVID-19 in the initial stages of the pandemic, strategies for the management of OHCA patients may have varied across hospitals.
methodA web-based questionnaire was used. The first section collected data about physician characteristics. In the second section, participants responded "Yes" or "No," if they had made changes in the areas of "personal protective equipment (PPE)" or "CPR Algorithm" for OHCA patients (these changes were the personal views of the surveyed respondents). The questionnaire was sent to the members of the Emergency Medicine Alliance mailing list. The response period was from May 22 to June 5, 2020 (the first state of emergency related to COVID-19 was declared on April 7, 2020, in Japan). Participants were asked to indicate their stress level resulting from these changes using the Likert scale ranging from 1 to 10, where 1 = "no stress" and 10 = "severe stress."
resultA total of 110 physicians responded during the study period. The majority of participants reported changes in "PPE" (n = 106, 96.4%) and "CPR Algorithm" (n = 86, 78.2%). The reported stress level due to changes in PPE was 8 (IQR 6-9) and due to changes in the CPR algorithm, it was 7 (IQR 5-8).
conclusionFindings of this study suggest that physicians experienced changes in care for OHCA patients and felt stress during the initial stage of the COVID-19 pandemic. Thus, it would be better to list the actual measures that can be undertaken to prepare for any future pandemics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.