Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35800760›Full record

ReviewiScience2022

Establishing a quality management framework for commercial inoculants containing arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi.

Matthias J Salomon, Stephanie J Watts-Williams, Michael J McLaughlin, Heike Bücking, Brajesh K Singh, Imke Hutter, Carolin Schneider, Francis M Martin, Miroslav Vosatka, Liangdong Guo and 9 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in iScience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Alleviating Plant Density and Salinity Stress inJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Diversity, Distribution, and applications ofSaudi journal of biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Matthias J SalomonThe Waite Research Institute and The School of Agriculture, Food and Wine, The University of Adelaide, Waite Campus, PMB1 Glen Osmond, SA 5064, Australia.
Stephanie J Watts-WilliamsThe Waite Research Institute and The School of Agriculture, Food and Wine, The University of Adelaide, Waite Campus, PMB1 Glen Osmond, SA 5064, Australia.
Michael J McLaughlinThe Waite Research Institute and The School of Agriculture, Food and Wine, The University of Adelaide, Waite Campus, PMB1 Glen Osmond, SA 5064, Australia.
Heike BückingUniversity of Missouri, Division of Plant Sciences, Columbia, MO 65211, USA.
Brajesh K SinghGlobal Centre for Land-Based Innovation, Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Penrith, SA 2747, Australia.
Imke HutterINOQ GmbH, Schnega 29465, Germany.
Carolin SchneiderINOQ GmbH, Schnega 29465, Germany.
Francis M MartinUniversité de Lorraine, INRAE, UMR Interactions Arbres/Microorganismes, Centre INRAE Grand Est-Nancy, Champenoux, France.
Miroslav VosatkaThe Institute of Botany, Czech Academy of Sciences, Zamek 1, 25243 Pruhonice, Czech Republic.
Liangdong GuoState Key Laboratory of Mycology, Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, No. 3 1st Beichen West Rd., Chaoyang District, Beijing 100101, China.
Tatsuhiro EzawaGraduate School of Agriculture, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido 060-8589, Japan.
Masanori SaitoIwate University, Morioka, Iwate 020-8550, Japan.
Stéphane DeclerckLaboratory of Mycology, Earth and Life Institute, Université catholique de Louvain, Croix du Sud 3, 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
Yong-Guan ZhuKey Laboratory of Urban Environment and Health, Institute of Urban Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 1799 Jimei Road, Xiamen 361021, China.
Timothy BowlesDepartment of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
Lynette K AbbottUWA School of Agriculture and Environment and UWA Institute of Agriculture, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.
F Andrew SmithThe Waite Research Institute and The School of Agriculture, Food and Wine, The University of Adelaide, Waite Campus, PMB1 Glen Osmond, SA 5064, Australia.
Timothy R CavagnaroThe Waite Research Institute and The School of Agriculture, Food and Wine, The University of Adelaide, Waite Campus, PMB1 Glen Osmond, SA 5064, Australia.
Marcel G A van der HeijdenPlant-Soil-Interaction Group, Institute for Sustainability Science, Agroscope, Zürich, 8046 Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbial inoculants containing arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi are potential tools in increasing the sustainability of our food production systems. Given the demand for sustainable agriculture, the production of such inoculants has potential economic value and has resulted in a variety of commercial inoculants currently being advertised. However, their use is limited by inconsistent product efficacy and lack of consumer confidence. Here, we propose a framework that can be used to assess the quality and reliability of AM inoculants. First, we set out a range of basic quality criteria which are required to achieve reliable inoculants. This is followed by a standardized bioassay which can be used to test inoculum viability and efficacy under controlled conditions. Implementation of these measurements would contribute to the adoption of AM inoculants by producers with the potential to increase sustainability in food production systems.

Indexed as

Biological sciencesBiotechnologyEnvironmental healthEnvironmental scienceInteraction of plants with organismsPlant biologyPlant nutrition

Identifiers

PMID35800760
PMCPMC9254352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.