ArticleGland surgery2022
Sentinel lymph node metastasis diagnosis using ultrasound plus magnetic resonance lymphangiography in breast cancer.
Article in Gland surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Ultrasound diagnosis is a highly specific tool and widely applied, but is associated with low sensitivity in detection of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs). The diagnostic value of routine ultrasound combining magnetic resonance lymphangiography (MRL) for the detection of SLNs in breast cancer metastasis is still unclear. This study used ultrasound combined with MRL to explore the diagnostic value of detecting SLN metastasis in breast cancer. Methods: This study included female breast cancer patients who received modified radical mastectomy at the Department of Breast Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University between January 2016 and January 2019. The gold standard of SLNs is pathological results. The patients were divided into three groups: (I) Group A: an ultrasound plus MRL (contrast agent injected outside the areola) group; (II) Group B: an ultrasound plus MRL (contrast agent injection around the areola) group; and (III) Group C: an ultrasound plus MRL group (this group comprised patients from the two aforementioned groups). Results: A total of 432 patients were included. The overall detection rate and overall diagnostic accuracy of SLNs in breast cancer differed significantly among the three groups (all P<0.05). Ultrasound plus MRL showed a best overall detection rate 56.02%, and a best diagnostic accuracy 95.83%. The detection rate and diagnostic accuracy of axillary SLNs varied markedly among the three groups (P<0.05). The detection rate and diagnostic accuracy when the internal mammary node was the SLN differed notably between the ultrasound plus MRL (contrast agent injected outside the areola) and ultrasound plus MRL (contrast agent injection around the areola) groups and between the ultrasound plus MRL (contrast agent injection around the areola) and ultrasound plus MRL groups (all P<0.05). Conclusions: Ultrasound plus MRL may be advantageous for the detection of SLN metastasis in breast cancer and predicting breast cancer prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.