Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35800660›Full record

ReviewOpen access journal of sports medicine2022

Optimal Graft Choice in Athletic Patients with Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries: Review and Clinical Insights.

Katarina Sim, Richard Rahardja, Mark Zhu, Simon W Young

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Open access journal of sports medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06636045 (Effect of Blood Flow Restriction), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06636045 enrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Blood Flow Restriction (BFR) on Rehabilitation Protocols Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction (ACLR) With Quadricep Autograft

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorUniversity of Kansas Medical CenterRan2024 to 2027Enrolled40ConditionsAutografts, Blood Flow Restriction Therapy, Rehabilitation Outcome, Quadriceps Muscle StrengthArmsNot applicable- observational study
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Comparison of autograft and allograft outcomes in adolescent ACL reconstruction: a propensity score analysis.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. New Graft Choices for ACL Reconstruction: Update Article.Revista brasileira de ortopedia · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Katarina SimDepartment of Orthopaedics, North Shore Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-1740-4071
Richard RahardjaDepartment of Orthopaedics, North Shore Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.
Mark ZhuDepartment of Orthopaedics, North Shore Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.
Simon W YoungDepartment of Orthopaedics, North Shore Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.
North Shore Hospital · NZUniversity of Auckland · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture is a common sporting-related knee injury with a potentially detrimental impact on the athlete's career, yet there is no formal consensus on the optimal graft choice for reconstructing the ruptured ACL in this specific population. Options for reconstruction include autograft, allograft, and artificial grafts. However, each has associated failure risk and donor site morbidity. Our operational definition of the athlete is a skeletally mature individual participating in high level activity with the expectation to return to pre-injury level of activity. The athlete has unique injury characteristics, post-operative expectations, and graft demands that differ to the general population. Long-term outcomes are of particular importance given on-going mechanical demands on the reconstructed knee. Therefore, the purpose of this review is to consolidate current literature on the various ACL reconstruction graft options, with a focus on the optimal graft for returning the athlete to activity with the lowest rate of re-injury.

Indexed as

anterior cruciate ligamentathletegraft choicegraft failurereconstructionreturn to activity

Identifiers

PMID35800660
PMCPMC9255990
OpenAlexW4283755540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.