Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35800524›Full record

ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2022

Is it a challenging task to work with personal protective equipment in a COVID-19 ICU: Findings from a hospital-based cross-sectional study from north India.

Karthikeyan Mahalingam, Surbhi, Akshaya Balaji, Ragul Ganesh, Roy Arokiam Daniel, Richa Aggarwal, Kapil Dev Soni, Akhil Kant Singh, Puneet Khanna, Viney Gupta and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Death by accidental intravenous administration of gasoline.International journal of legal medicine · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Karthikeyan MahalingamDepartment of Ophthalmology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India.
SurbhiDepartment of Anaethesia and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India.
Akshaya BalajiDepartment of Ophthalmology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India.
Ragul GaneshDepartment of Psychiatry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India.
Roy Arokiam DanielDepartment of Centre for Community Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India.
Richa AggarwalDepartment of Anaethesia and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India.
Kapil Dev SoniDepartment of Anaethesia and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India.
Akhil Kant SinghDepartment of Anaethesia and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India.
Puneet KhannaDepartment of Anaethesia and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India.
Viney GuptaDepartment of Ophthalmology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India.
Anjan TrikhaDepartment of Anaethesia and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Amidst the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the use of personal protective equipment (PPE) is mandatory for healthcare workers to remain protected against infection. The present study was undertaken to evaluate challenges faced by the healthcare workers while using level 3 PPE. Methods: This hospital-based study was conducted among resident doctors selected by convenience sampling method using a pretested, semi-structured, self-administered questionnaire after getting informed consent from the participants to collect data on the somatic, psychological, and technical problems faced while working in PPE. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression was done between outcome variables and other independent variables to check for the association. Results: Of the total, 252 resident doctors completed the survey, their age ranged from 22 to 36 years with 140 (55.6%) males and 112 (44.4%) females. One-twenty-nine (51.2%) residents were trained to work in ICU, 73 (29%) participants used PPE ≤10 times and the rest 179 (71%) used PPE more than 10 times. The difficulties faced were as follows: visual impairment ( Conclusion: A longer duration of work is associated with headache, hunger, anxiety, and sleep disturbances. More research has to be done to improve the PPE to reduce problems like visual impairment, skin irritation, sweating, and breathing difficulty.

Indexed as

COVID-19 ICUheadachehealthcare workerPPEvisual impairment

Identifiers

PMID35800524
PMCPMC9254845
OpenAlexW4284975386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.