ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2022
COVID-19 infection among health care workers: A hospital based study from Indian state of Meghalaya.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: COVID-19 can infect any individual, but the group most susceptible is the Health Care Workers (HCWs) who are directly involved in COVID-19 patient care. Despite adhering to the recommended personal prospective equipment, a disproportionately large number of cases of COVID-19 were reported among the HCWs. Aims and Objectives: To study the burden of COVID-19 infection among the HCWs and to study the probable factors associated with increased risk of COVID-19 infection among HCWs. Materials and Methods: A hospital-based prospective cross-sectional study was conducted at a tertiary care teaching institute in the state of Meghalaya, India for the period between 1 Results and Observations: A total of 144 cases were included in the study. The mean age of affected HCWs was 33.83 ± 1.408 years and male to female ratio was 0.47:1. The commonest age group affected was 18 to 30 years of age (45.14%). The majority of the HCWs were Nursing Officers (staff) (52.78%) followed by Resident Doctors (18.06%). Out of all cases, 135 (93.75%) were either asymptomatic or had mildly symptoms. In 96 (66.67%) HCWs, there was high-risk contact with a known case of COVID-19. High-risk contact outside the COVID-19 designated area of the hospital was noted in 53 (36.81%) cases; however, only 22 (15.27%) patients had a history of working in the COVID-19 designated area at the workplace. Conclusion: The most common group that got infected was the nursing staff followed by the resident doctors, with more than ninety percent of the cases having either mild symptoms or were asymptomatic. The risk of contracting COVID-19 infection was higher in non-COVID-19 as compared to COVID-19 designated areas of the hospital.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.