Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35800423›Full record

ArticleAsia Oceania journal of nuclear medicine & biology2022

Non-Cutaneous Melanoma, Findings and Prognostic Value of FDG PET/CT: A Case Series of 23 patients and review of the literature.

Bahare Saidi, Babak Fallahi, Armaghan Fard-Esfahani, Alireza Emami-Ardekani, Mohammad Eftekhari

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asia Oceania journal of nuclear medicine & biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bahare SaidiResearch Center for Nuclear Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Babak FallahiResearch Center for Nuclear Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Armaghan Fard-EsfahaniResearch Center for Nuclear Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Alireza Emami-ArdekaniResearch Center for Nuclear Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad EftekhariResearch Center for Nuclear Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Tehran University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Non-cutaneous malignant melanomas (NCM) are rare malignancies. Due to their nonspecific symptoms, they present later in life. The value of FDG PET/CT in this group of patients is not clear. The aim of this study is to assess the role of FDG PET/CT in the management of NCM and its prognostic implication. Methods: We retrospectively selected twenty-three patients with a diagnosis of NCM evaluated with FDG PET/CT in Shariati hospital between 2019 and 2021. The PET/CT data were reviewed and compared with available conventional imaging findings. Five patients died within five months. The surviving patients were followed within a time interval of 7 to 27.5 months after their PET/CT study, regarding their disease status. Results: Among 23 patients (8 ocular, 5 sinonasal, 3 pharyngeal, 2 anorectal, 2 vulvovaginal, and 3 unknown primaries), PET/CT was able to detect residual primary disease, assess treatment response, and reveal or exclude metastases. Additional lesions compared to conventional imaging were found in five, while in one with brain metastases PET/CT was unable to detect lesions on MRI. Thirteen patients had negative PET/CT finding of which 11 (85%) did not have remarkable finding on follow-up. Metastatic disease was recognized in eight. Patients with extensive metastases on FDG PET/CT had a poorer outcome. Conclusion: Similar to cutaneous melanoma, PET/CT is valuable in the management of NCM patients and is superior to conventional imaging modalities, with the exception of brain metastases. Patients with negative PET/CT findings have a better outcome as opposed to patients with significant positive PET/CT findings.

Indexed as

MetastasesNon-cutaneous melanomaPET/CTPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID35800423
PMCPMC9205851
OpenAlexW4285741654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.