Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35800297›Full record

ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2022

Clinical and radiomics prediction of complete response in rectal cancer pre-chemoradiotherapy.

Peter Mbanu, Mark P Saunders, Hitesh Mistry, Joe Mercer, Lee Malcomson, Saif Yousif, Gareth Price, Rohit Kochhar, Andrew G Renehan, Marcel van Herk and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Peter MbanuDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Mark P SaundersDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Hitesh MistryDivision of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Joe MercerDepartment of Radiological Oncology, Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Lee MalcomsonDivision of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Saif YousifDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Lancashire Teaching Hospital, Preston, United Kingdom.
Gareth PriceDivision of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Rohit KochharDepartment of Radiological Oncology, Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Andrew G RenehanDivision of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Marcel van HerkDivision of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Eliana Vasquez OsorioDivision of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and purpose: Patients with rectal cancer could avoid major surgery if they achieve clinical complete response (cCR) post neoadjuvant treatment. Therefore, prediction of treatment outcomes before treatment has become necessary to select the best neo-adjuvant treatment option. This study investigates clinical and radiomics variables' ability to predict cCR in patients pre chemoradiotherapy. Materials and methods: Using the OnCoRe database, we recruited a matched cohort of 304 patients (152 with cCR; 152 without cCR) deriving training (N = 200) and validation (N = 104) sets. We collected pre-treatment MR (magnetic resonance) images, demographics and blood parameters (haemoglobin, neutrophil, lymphocyte, alkaline phosphate and albumin). We segmented the gross tumour volume on T2 Weighted MR Images and extracted 1430 stable radiomics features per patient. We used principal component analysis (PCA) and receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (ROC AUC) to reduce dimensionality and evaluate the models produced. Results: Using Logistic regression analysis, PCA-derived combined model (radiomics plus clinical variables) gave a ROC AUC of 0.76 (95% CI: 0.69-0.83) in the training set and 0.68 (95% CI 0.57-0.79) in the validation set. The clinical only model achieved an AUC of 0.73 (95% CI 0.66-0.80) and 0.62 (95% CI 0.51-0.74) in the training and validation set, respectively. The radiomics model had an AUC of 0.68 (95% CI 0.61-0.75) and 0.66 (95% CI 0.56-0.77) in the training and validation sets. Conclusion: The predictive characteristics of both clinical and radiomics variables for clinical complete response remain modest but radiomics predictability is improved with addition of clinical variables.

Indexed as

ChemoradiotherapyMagnetic resonance imagingRadiomicsRectal cancerTreatment response

Identifiers

PMID35800297
PMCPMC9253904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.