ArticleFrontiers in neurology2022
Flow Diverter in Unruptured Intracranial Vertebral Artery Dissecting Aneurysm.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Posterior Circulation Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Comparison Between Saccular and Dissecting Aneurysms.Brain and behavior · 2026Article
- Parent Artery Disease-Related Stroke: What Is the Impact on Endovascular Treatment? A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Risk Factors for Unfavorable Angiographic Outcomes after Reconstructive Endovascular Treatments of Unruptured Vertebral Artery Dissecting Aneurysms.Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society · 2026Article
- Article
- Patency of the lenticulostriate and Pontine arteries after stenting of the intracranial arteries.Neurosurgical review · 2025Article
- Risk Factors and Predictive Model for Ischemic Complications in Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms: Insights From a Large Patient Cohort.Aging medicine (Milton (N.S.W)) · 2025Article
- Treatment of unruptured intracranial vertebral artery dissection aneurysms with Flow Diverter compared with conventional stent-assisted coiling-a single-center study.Acta neurochirurgica · 2024Observational
- Multiple telescopic stenting versus single flow diverter for the treatment of vertebral artery dissecting aneurysm.Journal of cerebrovascular and endovascular neurosurgery · 2024Article
- Endovascular Treatment for Intracranial Artery Dissections in Posterior Circulation.Journal of neuroendovascular therapy · 2024Review
- Flow Diverter Treatment Using a Flow Re-Direction Endoluminal Device for Unruptured Intracranial Vertebral Artery Dissecting Aneurysm: Single-Center Case Series and Technical Considerations.Neurointervention · 2023Article
- Flow diverters in the treatment of unruptured vertebral artery dissecting aneurysm: A single-center experience.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Article
- Safety and effectiveness of double microcatheter technique in the treatment of ruptured aneurysms of anterior cerebral circulation.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Intracranial vertebral artery dissecting aneurysm (VADA) may present as aneurysmal dilation alone, dilation with coexisting stenosis, or, in some cases, as a recurrent aneurysm after previous reconstructive treatment. To date, the clinical utility of flow diverters in VADA has not been examined according to these various circumstances. This study aims to report the safety and efficacy of flow diverters in the treatment of various manifestations of intracranial VADA. Methods: A total of 26 patients and 27 VADAs treated with flow diverting stents from November 2014 to September 2021 were included. Medical records and radiologic data were analyzed to assess the safety and efficacy of flow diverting stents. Results: The results showed that 12 cases (44.4%) presented with aneurysmal dilation only, 7 (26.0%) with aneurysmal dilation and one or more associated stenotic lesions, and 8 (29.6%) as recurrence after previous treatment, including stent-assisted coil embolization ( Conclusion: Flow diverters have proven safe and effective in unruptured VADA. However, the complete occlusion rate with the flow diverter is relatively lower in VADA with stenosis or with previous stent placement than in dilation-only lesions. Further study with a larger cohort would be needed to confirm these results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.