Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35800062›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

Development of a Deep Learning System to Detect Esophageal Cancer by Barium Esophagram.

Peipei Zhang, Yifei She, Junfeng Gao, Zhaoyan Feng, Qinghai Tan, Xiangde Min, Shengzhou Xu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Peipei ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Yifei SheCollege of Computer Science, South-Central University for Nationalities, Wuhan, China.
Junfeng GaoCollege of Biomedical Engineering, South-Central of University for Nationalities, Wuhan, China.
Zhaoyan FengDepartment of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Qinghai TanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Xiangde MinDepartment of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Shengzhou XuCollege of Computer Science, South-Central University for Nationalities, Wuhan, China.
Huazhong University of Science and Technology · CNSouth Central University for Nationalities · CNTongji Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Implementation of deep learning systems (DLSs) for analysis of barium esophagram, a cost-effective diagnostic test for esophageal cancer detection, is expected to reduce the burden to radiologists while ensuring the accuracy of diagnosis. Objective: To develop an automated DLS to detect esophageal cancer on barium esophagram. Methods: This was a retrospective study using deep learning for esophageal cancer detection. A two-stage DLS (including a Selection network and a Classification network) was developed. Five datasets based on barium esophagram were used for stepwise training, validation, and testing of the DLS. Datasets 1 and 2 were used to respectively train and test the Selection network, while Datasets 3, 4, and 5 were respectively used to train, validate, and test the Classification network. Finally, a positioning box with a probability value was outputted by the DLS. A region of interest delineated by experienced radiologists was selected as the ground truth to evaluate the detection and classification efficiency of the DLS. Standard machine learning metrics (accuracy, recall, precision, sensitivity, and specificity) were calculated. A comparison with the conventional visual inspection approach was also conducted. Results: The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of our DLS in detecting esophageal cancer were 90.3%, 92.5%, and 88.7%, respectively. With the aid of DLS, the radiologists' interpretation time was significantly shortened (Reader1, 45.7 s vs. 72.2 s without DLS aid; Reader2, 54.1 s vs. 108.7 s without DLS aid). Respective diagnostic efficiencies for Reader1 with and without DLS aid were 96.8% vs. 89.3% for accuracy, 97.5% vs. 87.5% for sensitivity, 96.2% vs. 90.6% for specificity, and 0.969 vs. 0.890 for AUC. Respective diagnostic efficiencies for Reader2 with and without DLS aid were 95.7% vs. 88.2% for accuracy, 92.5% vs. 77.5% for sensitivity, 98.1% vs. 96.2% for specificity, and 0.953 vs. 0.869 for AUC. Of note, the positioning boxes outputted by the DLS almost overlapped with those manually labeled by the radiologists on Dataset 5. Conclusions: The proposed two-stage DLS for detecting esophageal cancer on barium esophagram could effectively shorten the interpretation time with an excellent diagnostic performance. It may well assist radiologists in clinical practice to reduce their burden.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencebarium esophagramdeep learningesophageal cancerimage classificationimage detection

Identifiers

PMID35800062
PMCPMC9253273
OpenAlexW4283212081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.