Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35800052›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

Community-Driven Identification and Adaptation of a Cancer Caregiving Intervention for LGBTQIA Populations.

Charles S Kamen, Theresa A Hastert, Megan Mulvaney, Forrest Hosea, Alexandra M VanBergen, Ali Fakih, Knoll Larkin, Evan Killingsworth, Hayley S Thompson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. "Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Charles S KamenCancer Control Unit, Department of Surgery, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, United States.
Theresa A HastertKarmanos Cancer Institute, Department of Oncology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, United States.
Megan MulvaneyKarmanos Cancer Institute, Department of Oncology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, United States.
Forrest HoseaKarmanos Cancer Institute, Department of Oncology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, United States.
Alexandra M VanBergenCancer Control Unit, Department of Surgery, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, United States.
Ali FakihKarmanos Cancer Institute, Department of Oncology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, United States.
Knoll LarkinNational LGBT Cancer Network, New York, NY, United States.
Evan KillingsworthLGBT Detroit, Detroit, MI, United States.
Hayley S ThompsonKarmanos Cancer Institute, Department of Oncology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, United States.
Wayne State University · USThe Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute · USUniversity of Rochester · USNational LGBT Cancer Network · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and other LGBTQIA cancer patients experience significant disparities in cancer-related outcomes. Their relationships may not be acknowledged in care systems designed to serve primarily heterosexual and cisgender (H/C) patients, and resources for partners and caregivers of H/C patients may not address the needs of LGBTQIA caregivers. Tailored interventions are needed to address disparities in LGBTQIA patients and caregivers. Methods: To address this gap, researchers from Karmanos Cancer Institute in Detroit, MI and Wilmot Cancer Institute in Rochester, NY worked with a cancer action council (CAC) of LGBTQIA stakeholders with lived experience of cancer in a community-academic partnership. This group used the ADAPT-ITT model to guide their process of assessing needs in this community, identifying evidence-based interventions that could be adapted to meet those needs, and beginning the process of adapting an existing intervention to meet the needs of a new population. Results: In the Assessment phase of the model, CAC members shared their own experiences and concerns related to cancer and identified cancer caregiving as a priority area for intervention. In the Decision-Making phase of the model, researchers and CAC members performed a review of the literature on interventions that reported outcomes for cancer caregiver, identifying 13 promising interventions. Each of these interventions was evaluated over a series of meetings using a scoring rubric. Based on this rubric, the FOCUS intervention was established as an appropriate target for adaptation to the LGBTQIA population. In the first stage of the Adaptation phase, CAC members reacted to the intervention content and identified principal components for adaptation. Conclusion: While the FOCUS intervention adaptation is still in process, this manuscript can serve as a guide for others establishing community-academic partnerships to adapt interventions, as well as those developing interventions and resources for LGBTQIA persons coping with cancer.

Indexed as

adaptationcancercaregivinggender identityhealth disparitiessexual and gender minorities (SGM)sexual orientation

Identifiers

PMID35800052
PMCPMC9253545
OpenAlexW4283213389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.