Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35799898›Full record

ReviewMaterials today. Bio2022

Precision medicine strategies for spinal degenerative diseases: Injectable biomaterials with in situ repair and regeneration.

Xiaoming Zhao, Hongyun Ma, Hao Han, Liuyang Zhang, Jing Tian, Bo Lei, Yingang Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials today. Bio, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. The research progress and potential applications ofThe British journal of nutrition · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. [Research progress of bioactive scaffolds in repair and regeneration of osteoporotic bone defects].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xiaoming ZhaoDepartment of Orthopaedics of the First Affiliated Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi, China.
Hongyun MaDepartment of Orthopaedics of the First Affiliated Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi, China.
Hao HanDepartment of Orthopaedics of the First Affiliated Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi, China.
Liuyang ZhangFrontier Institute of Science and Technology, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710054, Shaanxi, China.
Jing TianFrontier Institute of Science and Technology, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710054, Shaanxi, China.
Bo LeiDepartment of Orthopaedics of the First Affiliated Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi, China.
Yingang ZhangDepartment of Orthopaedics of the First Affiliated Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi, China.
First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University · CNXi'an Jiaotong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the population ages, spinal degeneration seriously affects quality of life in middle-aged and elderly patients, and prevention and treatment remain challenging for clinical surgeons. In recent years, biomaterials-based injectable therapeutics have attracted much attention for spinal degeneration treatment due to their minimally invasive features and ability to perform precise repair of irregular defects. However, the precise design and functional control of bioactive injectable biomaterials for efficient spinal degeneration treatment remains a challenge. Although many injectable biomaterials have been reported for the treatment of spinal degeneration, there are few reviews on the advances and effects of injectable biomaterials for spinal degeneration treatment. This work reviews the current status of the design and fabrication of injectable biomaterials, including hydrogels, bone cements and scaffolds, microspheres and nanomaterials, and the current progress in applications for treating spinal degeneration. Additionally, registered clinical trials were also summarized and key challenges and clinical translational prospects for injectable materials for the treatment of spinal degenerative diseases are discussed.

Indexed as

Injectable biomaterialsIntervertebral disc degenerationOsteoporotic vertebral compression fractureSpinal degeneration

Identifiers

PMID35799898
PMCPMC9254127
OpenAlexW4283331890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.