Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35799880›Full record

ArticleClinical and experimental vaccine research2022

Exploring the myths surrounding the COVID-19 vaccines in Africa: the study to investigate their impacts on acceptance using online survey and social media.

Emmanuel Lamptey, Ephraim Kumi Senkyire, Serwaa Dorcas, Dooshima Aki Benita, Evans Osei Boakye, Theckla Ikome, Alex Asamoah

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and experimental vaccine research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Emmanuel LampteyInstitute of Life and Earth Sciences (Including Health and Agriculture), Pan African University, University of Ibadan, Oyo, Nigeria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7822-7593
Ephraim Kumi SenkyireGa-West Municipal Hospital, Ghana Health Service, Accra, Ghana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0789-701X
Serwaa DorcasInstitute of Life and Earth Sciences (Including Health and Agriculture), Pan African University, University of Ibadan, Oyo, Nigeria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8583-4415
Dooshima Aki BenitaDepartment of Psychology, Benue State University, Makurdi, Nigeria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5393-4411
Evans Osei BoakyeDepartment of Social Work, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0737-5126
Theckla IkomeInstitute of Life and Earth Sciences (Including Health and Agriculture), Pan African University, University of Ibadan, Oyo, Nigeria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8907-306X
Alex AsamoahShai Osudoku District Hospital, Ghana Health Service, Accra, Ghana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9225-8620
Lead City University · NGGhana Health Service · GHBenue State University · NGUniversity of Ghana · GH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine is the key to getting out of the pandemic. However, acceptance of the vaccine has been affected by false information and rumors, which have kept people from getting the shot since it was rolled out. Materials and Methods: This study aimed to investigate the various misconceptions surfaced about the COVID-19 vaccines in Africa. We performed an online survey using an anonymous questionnaire to reach out to African respondents by social media and all possible online platforms such as Facebook, WhatsApp, Instagram, Twitter, YouTube, and so forth. The web-based questionnaires about the myths surrounding the vaccines were extracted from nonscientific information, unproven statements, social media posts, news reports, and people's concerns about the safety of the COVID-19 vaccines. Participants indicated their level of agreement with each statement. Results: A total of 2,500 people responded to the online survey in Africa. The two common myths that respondents agreed with were that "since vaccines for COVID-19 have been developed, we can make vaccines for the common cold, human immunodeficiency viruses, and other diseases" (n=892, 35.7%) and that "researchers rushed the development of the COVID-19 vaccines; therefore, it is not very effective, safe and cannot be trusted" (n=595, 23.8%). The range of respondents who neither agreed nor disagreed with these myths was 12.4%-33.0%. The majority (1,931, 77.2%) indicated disagreement with the statement "after getting the COVID-19 vaccine, one can stop wearing a mask as well as taking safety precautions." Conclusion: Myths surrounding the COVID-19 vaccines have impact on acceptance. Exploring them helps public health authorities in Africa dispel them and provide accurate information to promote vaccination campaigns, education, and acceptance.

Indexed as

AfricaCOVID-19 vaccinesPatient acceptance of health careTherapeutic misconception

Identifiers

PMID35799880
PMCPMC9200652
OpenAlexW4284976069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.