ArticleData in brief2022
Characterisation data for open-air processed common water reed (
Article in Data in brief, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Currently, there are a lot of discussions on the production of sustainable cement for construction purposes, unlike the conventional ordinary Portland cement (OPC), as its production, transportation, and application contribute to the generation of greenhouse gases, hence, climate change. Consequently, limestone, the primary material used to produce OPC, is non-renewable. Therefore, there is a need to use sustainable materials to make cementitious materials to achieve sustainable construction. This has led to a lot of research focussing on the valorisation of agricultural wastes and less economical, no-food lignocellulosic plants in producing sustainable and environmentally friendly cementitious materials commonly known as Supplementary Cementitious Materials (SCMs). The agrowastes ashes include rice husk ash (RHA), sugarcane bagasse ash (SCBA), and corn cob ash (CCA), among others. In contrast, the lignocellulosic plants' ashes include common water reed ash (CWRA) and cyperus papyrus ash (CPA). There has been the belief that these pozzolanic materials are homogenous. However, these ashes are highly heterogeneous when they undergo microscopic analysis. Therefore, the current data paper provides Laser Diffraction Spectroscopy (LD) for Particle Size Distribution (PSD), Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF), and Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) data for unprocessed CWRA and CPA in the form of tables, micrographs, and figures for microscopic analysis. This data helps characterise and evaluate CWRA and CPA's potential as pozzolanic materials, especially as road construction materials, and will be beneficial for other scientists to better understand unprocessed CWRA and CPA mineral information development biologically inspired materials for biologically inspired materials sustainable development across many disciplines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.