Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35799797›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2022

Potential Determinants for Radiation-Induced Lymphopenia in Patients With Breast Cancer Using Interpretable Machine Learning Approach.

Hao Yu, Fang Chen, Ka-On Lam, Li Yang, Yang Wang, Jian-Yue Jin, Aya Ei Helali, Feng-Ming Spring Kong

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Hao YuInstitute of Biomedical and Health Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Shenzhen, China.
Fang ChenDepartment of Clinical Oncology, University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Ka-On LamDepartment of Clinical Oncology, University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Li YangDepartment of Clinical Oncology, University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Yang WangBiomedical Engineering, Shenzhen Polytechnic, Shenzhen, China.
Jian-Yue JinUniversity Hospitals/Cleverland Medical Center, Seidman Cancer Center and Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States.
Aya Ei HelaliDepartment of Clinical Oncology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Feng-Ming Spring KongDepartment of Clinical Oncology, University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
University of Hong Kong · HKUniversity of Hong Kong - Shenzhen Hospital · CNCase Western Reserve University · USShenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology · CNShenzhen Polytechnic · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radiation-induced lymphopenia is known for its survival significance in patients with breast cancer treated with radiation therapy. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of radiotherapy on lymphocytes by applying machine learning strategies. We used Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGboost) to predict the event of lymphopenia (grade≥1) and conduced an independent validation. Then, we induced feature attribution analysis (Shapley additive explanation, SHAP) in explaining the XGboost models to explore the directional contribution of each feature to lymphopenia. Finally, we implemented the proof-of-concept clinical validation. The results showed that the XGboost models had rigorous generalization performances (accuracies 0.764 and ROC-AUC 0.841, respectively) in the independent cohort. The baseline lymphocyte counts are the most protective feature (SHAP = 5.226, direction of SHAP = -0.964). Baseline platelets and monocytes also played important protective roles. The usage of taxane only chemotherapy was less risk on lymphopenia than the combination of anthracycline and taxane. By the contribution analysis of dose, we identified that firstly lymphocytes were sensitive to a radiation dose less than 4Gy; secondly the irradiation volume was more important in promoting lymphopenia than the irradiation dose; thirdly the irradiation dose promoted the event of lymphopenia when the irradiation volume was fixed. Overall, our findings paved the way to clarifying the radiation dose volume effect. To avoid radiation-induced lymphopenia, irradiation volume should be kept to a minimum during the planning process, as long as the target coverage is not compromised.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsLeukopeniaLymphopeniaRadiation InjuriesFemaleHumansMachine LearningTaxoidsTaxoidsbreast cancermachine learningradiation doseradiation-induced lymphopeniaSHapley Additive exPlanation

Identifiers

PMID35799797
PMCPMC9253393
OpenAlexW4283206051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.