Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35799690›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2022

Incidence of Refeeding Syndrome in Critically Ill Children With Nutritional Support.

Stéphanie Blanc, Tajnja Vasileva, Lyvonne N Tume, Florent Baudin, Carole Chessel Ford, Corinne Chaparro Jotterand, Frederic V Valla

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Refeeding syndrome in at-risk hospitalized children: A descriptive study.JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Stéphanie BlancHES-SO Master, HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Tajnja VasilevaHES-SO Master, HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Lyvonne N TumeSchool of Health and Society, University of Salford, Salford, United Kingdom.
Florent BaudinPediatric Intensive Care, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Carole Chessel FordPediatric Intensive Care, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Corinne Chaparro JotterandDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Geneva School of Health Sciences, HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, Geneva, Switzerland.
Frederic V VallaSchool of Health and Society, University of Salford, Salford, United Kingdom.
Hospices Civils de Lyon · FRHES-SO Genève · CHHES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland · CHUniversity of Lausanne · CHUniversity of Salford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Early enteral nutrition is recommended for critically ill children, potentially exposing those who are undernourished to the risk of refeeding syndrome. However, data on its incidence is lacking, and the heterogeneity of diagnostic criteria and frequent electrolyte disorders in this population make its diagnosis complex. In 2020, the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN) developed consensus recommendations for identifying patients at risk and with refeeding syndrome. These state that undernourished children are considered at risk of refeeding syndrome; those who develop one significant electrolyte disorder (decrease ≥ 10% in phosphorus, potassium, and/or magnesium) within the first five days of nutritional support, combined with a significant increase in energy intake, are considered to have refeeding syndrome. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of refeeding syndrome according to the ASPEN definition in critically ill children on nutritional support. Materials and Methods: A secondary analysis of two prospective cohorts conducted in a tertiary pediatric intensive care unit in France was undertaken, and additional data were retrospectively collected. Children included were those (0-18 years) admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit with a minimum of one phosphorus, potassium, and/or magnesium assay and who received exclusive or supplemental nutritional support. Undernourished children (body mass index z-score < -2 standard deviations) were considered at risk of refeeding syndrome. The ASPEN critiera were used to identify those with probable refeeding syndrome. Results: A total of 1,261 children were included in the study, with 199 children (15.8%) classified as undernourished, who were at risk of refeeding syndrome. Of these, 93 children were identified as having probable refeeding syndrome, giving an overall incidence of 7.4%. The incidence rate among at-risk children was 46.7%. Most patients (58.1%) were classified as having severe refeeding syndrome. Conclusion: Refeeding syndrome remains difficult to diagnose in critically ill children, due to frequent confounding factors impacting electrolyte plasma levels. These findings suggest that refeeding syndrome incidence may be high in undernourished children, and that refeeding syndromes can be severe. Further prospective studies using the ASPEN definition and risk criteria are required.

Indexed as

critically ill childrenhypokalemiahypomagnesemiahypophosphatemiamalnutritionnutritional supportpediatric intensive care unitrefeeding syndrome (RFS)

Identifiers

PMID35799690
PMCPMC9253668
OpenAlexW4283208584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.