ArticleComputational and mathematical methods in medicine2022
Intelligent Reconstruction Algorithm-Based Computed Tomography Images for Automatic Detection of Gastric Tumor.
Article in Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to explore the application of computed tomography (CT) images in the diagnosis of gastric tumor under the intelligent reconstruction algorithm (IRA). 120 patients with gastric cancer were selected and all the patients underwent CT scanning, and CT images were analyzed based on the Feldkamp-Davis-Kress algorithm (FDK algorithm) to evaluate the imaging features of gastric lesions. According to biopsy or surgical pathology, the detection rate of CT images was calculated. The results showed that there were three pathological types of benign tumors (polyps, leiomyomas, and mesenchymomas) and three pathological types of malignant tumors (mesenchymomas, adenomas, and lymphomas). In addition, the detection rates of CT scans were different, reaching 94.2% on different orientations of the stomach, 90.7% of benign tumors, and 90.9% of malignant tumors, so the detection rate of different orientations was relatively high. CT images based on the FDK IRA could realize a high detection rate in diagnosis, accurately locate the lesion, and display the characteristics of the lesion and the metastasis of surrounding tissues; there were significant differences between benign and malignant gastric tumors in CT images, and the detection effect was obvious, which is worthy of clinical application and promotion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.