Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35799654›Full record

ArticleComputational and mathematical methods in medicine2022

Efficacy of Fenestration Decompression for the Treatment of Oral and Maxillofacial Cysts.

Zhangyi Li

RetractedOpen access · hybridAbstract readRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 53% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zhangyi LiDepartment of Stomatology, The Fifth Central Hospital of Tianjin, Tianjin 300450, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6977-7975
Fifth Tianjin Central Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Surgery is the mainstay of treatment for oral and maxillofacial cysts. Compared with open surgery that will bring more harm to patients, fenestration decompression, as a surgical method with good curative effects and little damage, has received increasing attention in the treatment of oral and maxillofacial cysts. Methods: The clinical data of 135 patients with oral and maxillofacial cysts visited the Fifth Central Hospital of Tianjin between June 2019 and September 2021 were collected for retrospective analysis. Patients were assigned to two groups based on the treatment plan implemented: the control group ( Results: In comparison with the control group, the observation group was observed to have a higher total effective rate, less operation time, shorter hospital stays, and less intraoperative bleeding ( Conclusion: Fenestration decompression is highly effective in treating oral and maxillofacial cysts, contributing to fewer complications, markedly relieved symptoms, shorter hospitalization time, well-preserved facial nerves, and low recurrence rate in the later period, which is worthy of clinical promotion.

Indexed as

CystsDecompressionHumansLength of StayRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID35799654
PMCPMC9256320
OpenAlexW4283699856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.