Trial reportComputational and mathematical methods in medicine2022
A Comparative Study on the Suitability and Treatment Compliance of an Improved Wristband Wearing Method Compared with the Traditional Method.
Trial report in Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Retracted: A Comparative Study on the Suitability and Treatment Compliance of an Improved Wristband Wearing Method Compared with the Traditional Method.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-06-28Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Human Subject Welfare · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Lack of IRB/IACUC Approval and/or Compliance · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Wristband identification (wristband for short) is an accurate and reliable tool for patients, and it is the basic requirement of the whole medical activity of the hospital. Wearing wristband correctly can help clinical medical staff to identify patients quickly and accurately and effectively prevent medical errors and medical accidents. According to the survey, the wristband wearing rate of clinical patients is still low, mainly because the wristband is tight and improper and the medical staff education is not in place. Therefore, how to scientifically and effectively improve the wearing rate and accuracy of patients' wristbands is an urgent nursing safety problem to be solved. Accurate identification of children is the key to ensure the safety of clinical drug use and carry out diagnosis and treatment, and wearing wristbands is the main way to identify children. Objective: A case-control study was conducted to explore the suitability and treatment compliance of an enhanced wristband wearing method compared with the traditional method. Methods: 260 hospitalized children admitted to our hospital from March 2019 to June 2021 were randomly divided into control group and study group. The control group used a traditional wristband, while the study group used a modified wristband. The existence of wristbands, the recognition speed of medical staff, the clarity of wristband handwriting, and the incidence of skin depression were observed in the two groups. The local skin reaction, wearing rate, incidence of wristband-related adverse events, identity compliance, and family satisfaction of patients with wristband were compared. Results: In terms of authentication compliance, the normal authentication frequency of the observation group was higher than that of the control group, but the difference was not statistically significant ( Conclusion: On the basis of ensuring children's compliance, the improved wristband wearing method can reduce the incidence of wristband shedding and ligature marks, reduce the diagnosis and treatment error rate, enhance the suitability of wearing, enhance the work efficiency of doctors and treaters, and improve the satisfaction of diagnosis and treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.