Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35799561›Full record

ArticleAnnals of cardiac anaesthesia

Incidence and outcome of anaphylaxis in cardiac surgical patients.

Rahul Norawat, Akbar Vohra, Andrew Parkes, Niall J O'Keeffe, Sujata Anipindi, Marc O Maybauer

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of cardiac anaesthesia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. 2024 EACTS/EACTAIC/EBCP Guidelines on cardiopulmonary bypass in adult cardiac surgery.Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2025
    Article
  6. 2024 EACTS/EACTAIC/EBCP Guidelines on cardiopulmonary bypass in adult cardiac surgery.European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 4 countries.

Rahul NorawatDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester University and Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.
Akbar VohraDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester University and Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.
Andrew ParkesDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester University and Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.
Niall J O'KeeffeDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester University and Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.
Sujata AnipindiDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester University and Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.
Marc O MaybauerDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester University and Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK; Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, University of Queensland Critical Care Research Group and The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Australia; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Philipps University, Marburg, Germany; Advanced Cardiac and Critical Care, Nazih Zuhdi Transplant Institute, Integris Health, Oklahoma City, USA.
Manchester Academic Health Science Centre · GBManchester University NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Anaphylaxis is a rare but serious and potentially fatal complication of anesthesia. Little is known about the incidence and outcome of anaphylaxis in cardiac surgical patients, which we aimed to investigate. Methods: This was a 21-year retrospective study of cardiac surgical patients at Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK. Results: A total of 19 cases of anaphylaxis were reported among 17,589 patients (0.108%) undergoing cardiac surgery. The majority (15/19) occurred before cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), mostly during or within 30 min after the induction of anesthesia (10/19). Two occurred within 15 min of going onto CPB. Of these 17 cases, 11 were abandoned, and 6 proceeded. The severity of reactions in the patients who proceeded ranged from grade II to grade IV of the Ring and Messmer classification. Two cases occurred after the completion of surgery. All patients survived to 90 days. However, this did not appear to be related to CPB or protamine as most of the reactions occurred before CPB. Instead, the most common causative agents were gelofusine, antibiotics, muscle relaxants, and chlorhexidine. In 6 cases, surgery proceeded despite the anaphylaxis, in 11 cases the surgery was postponed, and in 2 cases the procedure had already been completed. Conclusion: As all patients survived, our results provide preliminary support for proceeding with surgery although we cannot speculate on the likely outcomes of patients who were postponed, had their surgery proceeded. Based on our data, the incidence of anaphylaxis in cardiac surgical patients may be 10-20 times higher than in the general surgical population.

Indexed as

AnaphylaxisCardiac Surgical ProceduresCardiopulmonary BypassHumansIncidenceRetrospective StudiesCardiopulmonary bypassmechanical circulatory supportresuscitationshock

Identifiers

PMID35799561
PMCPMC9387607
OpenAlexW4284975056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.