Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35799470›Full record

ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2022

Lack of consensus among healthcare professionals at a large academic medical center on the use of exome sequencing for prenatal diagnosis.

Kylie Johnson, Hadi Erfani, Mohamad Ali Maktabi, Ignatia Van den Veyver, Salma Nassef

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 91% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kylie JohnsonSchool of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3176-3460
Hadi ErfaniDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Mohamad Ali MaktabiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Ignatia Van den VeyverDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Salma NassefDepartment of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Baylor College of Medicine · US

Funding

Prenatal Genetic Diagnosis by Genomic Sequencing: A Prospective EvaluationR01HD055651 · NICHD · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Wendy K Chung, Vaidehi Jobanputra · 2007 to 2026
$16.5M
Preclinical and Clincial OutcomesP50HD103555 · NICHD · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI Sandesh Chakravarthy Sreenath Nagamani, David Loren Nelson · 2020 to 2026
$9.9M
NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD103555NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD055651NIH HHS P50HD103555NIH HHS R01HD055651
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prenatal exome sequencing (ES) is increasingly used for prenatal diagnosis because emerging data indicate it has incremental diagnostic benefit in pregnancies with fetal anomalies without identified genetic abnormalities by karyotyping and chromosomal microarray analysis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the medical community's attitude toward the clinical utility and use of exome sequencing for prenatal diagnosis and to address differences in attitudes and responses by type of practitioner, level of training, and years passed since last full-time training. We analyzed the answers of 109 trainees and professionals in the fields of genetic counseling, laboratory science, and medicine to an online survey addressing these topics. Multiple-choice questions asked participants about their awareness of prenatal ES and what genetic test they would choose to order in certain scenarios. Likert-scale questions assessed participants' opinions of statements asserting when prenatal ES should be used for diagnostic testing. Attitude toward the use of prenatal ES statistically differed (p < 0.05) by type of participant and level of training. Practicing genetic counselors and physicians were more selective in their recommendations for prenatal ES than laboratory scientists. Genetic counseling students and practicing genetic counselors felt similarly about indications for the use of prenatal ES, whereas medical students were more liberal in their recommendations for prenatal ES than practicing physicians. This study shows a lack of consensus among the medical community regarding the clinical utility and indications for prenatal ES.

Indexed as

ExomePrenatal DiagnosisAcademic Medical CentersConsensusDelivery of Health CareFemaleHumansPregnancyattitudesexome sequencingprenatal diagnosis

Identifiers

PMID35799470
PMCPMC10022483
OpenAlexW4284880964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.