Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35799462›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of public health2022

Young children's voices in an unlocked Sweden during the COVID-19 pandemic.

M Jenholt Nolbris, S Ragnarsson, A-L Brorsson, M Garcia de Avila, M Forsner, I Kull, A L Olinder, J Mattson, S Nilsson, A-C Rullander and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. COVID-19 vaccine uptake among young adults: Influence of asthma and sociodemographic factors.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

M Jenholt NolbrisInstitute of Health and Care Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6911-1484
S RagnarssonDepartment of Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå University, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0646-7184
A-L BrorssonDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8136-6340
M Garcia de AvilaDepartment of Nursing, Botucatu Medical School - UNESP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6652-4427
M ForsnerDepartment of Nursing, Umeå University, Sweden.
I KullDepartment of Clinical Science and Education, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden.
A L OlinderDepartment of Clinical Science and Education, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden.
J MattsonDepartment of Health Science, The Swedish Red Cross University College, Sweden.
S NilssonInstitute of Health and Care Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
A-C RullanderDepartment of Nursing, Umeå University, Sweden.
L-L RydströmDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1007-1959
P Olaya-ContrerasInstitute of Health and Care Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
M BerghammerThe Queen Silivia Children's Hospital Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Sweden.
Karolinska Institutet · SEUniversity of Gothenburg · SERöda Korsets Högskola · SESahlgrenska University Hospital · SEUmeå University · SEUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BRUniversity West · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, Sweden was one of the few countries that rejected lockdowns in favour of recommendations for restrictions, including careful hand hygiene and social distancing. Preschools and primary schools remained open. Several studies have shown negative impacts of the pandemic on children, particularly high levels of anxiety. The study aim was to explore how Swedish school-aged children aged 6-14 years, experienced the COVID-19 pandemic and their perceived anxiety.

methodsIn total, 774 children aged 6-14 years and their guardians answered an online questionnaire containing 24 questions, along with two instruments measuring anxiety: the Children's Anxiety Questionnaire and the Numerical Rating Scale. A convergent parallel mixed-methods design was used for analysing the quantitative and qualitative data. Each data source was first analysed separately, followed by a merged interpretative analysis.

resultsThe results showed generally low levels of anxiety, with no significant sex differences. Children who refrained from normal social activities or group activities (

conclusions

Indexed as

COVID-19AnxietyChildChild, PreschoolCommunicable Disease ControlFemaleHumansMalePandemicsSARS-CoV-2SwedenAnxietychildrenCOVID-19 pandemicmixed-methodsonline surveySweden

Identifiers

PMID35799462
PMCPMC9361420
OpenAlexW4284887239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.