Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35799373›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2022

Outcomes of Mayo Clinic reBoot camps for postimplementation training in the electronic health record.

Joel E Gordon, Sylvia M Belford, Dawn L Aranguren, David Blair, Richard Fleming, Nikunj M Gajarawala, Jon Heiderscheit, Susan B Laabs, Kathryn A Looft, Jordan K Rosedahl and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Joel E GordonChief Medical Information Officer, Mayo Clinic Health System Administration, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7619-9384
Sylvia M BelfordClinical Systems Education, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Dawn L ArangurenDivision of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
David BlairFamily Medicine, Mayo Clinic Health System-Northwest Wisconsin Region, Bloomer, Wisconsin, USA.
Richard FlemingFamily Practice, Mayo Clinic Health System-Southwest Minnesota Region, Mankato, Minnesota, USA.
Nikunj M GajarawalaDepartment of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.
Jon HeiderscheitChief Information Officer, Mayo Clinic Health System-Southwest Wisconsin Region, Onalaska, Wisconsin, USA.
Susan B LaabsFamily Practice, Mayo Clinic Health System-Southwest Minnesota Region, Mankato, Minnesota, USA.
Kathryn A LooftClinical Systems Education, Mayo Clinic Health System-Southwest Minnesota Region, Mankato, Minnesota, USA.
Jordan K RosedahlDivision of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
John C O'HoroDivision of Infectious Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

Funding

Mayo Clinic Center for Clinical and Translational Science (CCaTS UL1 Supplement - Dr. Timothy Curry)UL1TR002377 · NCATS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI VESNA D GAROVIC · 2017 to 2026
$78.4M
NCATS CTSANCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002377NCRR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAfter a new electronic health record (EHR) was implemented at Mayo Clinic, a training program called reBoot Camp was created to enhance ongoing education in response to needs identified by physician leaders. MATERIALS AND

methodsA reBoot camp focused on EHR topics pertinent to ambulatory care was offered from April 2018 through June 2020. There were 37 2-day sessions and 43 1-day sessions, with 673 unique participants. To evaluate outcomes of the reBoot camp, we used survey data to study baseline, immediate, and long-term perceptions of program satisfaction and self-assessed skills with the EHR. The study was conducted among practitioners at a large ambulatory practice network based in several states. Data were collected from April 2018 through January 2021. We analyzed automatically collected metadata and scores that evaluated the amount of personalization and proficiency of use.

resultsConfidence in skills increased by 13.5 points for general EHR use and was significant in 5 subdomains of use (13-18 point improvement). This degree of user confidence was maintained at the 6-month reassessment. The outcomes of configuration and proficiency scores also improved significantly. DISCUSSION: Ongoing education regarding EHR tools is necessary to support continued use of technology. This study was novel because of the amount and breadth of data collected, diversity of user participation, and validation that improvements were maintained over time.

conclusionsParticipating in a reBoot camp significantly improved user confidence in each domain of the EHR and demonstrated use of best-practice tools. Users maintained gains at the 6-month evaluation phase.

Indexed as

Ambulatory Care FacilitiesElectronic Health RecordsHumanscontinuing medical educationelectronic health recordhealth workforcemedical informaticsstaff development

Identifiers

PMID35799373
PMCPMC9382368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.