Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35799241›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurogastroenterology and motility2022

The Predictive Value of Intraoperative Esophageal Functional Luminal Imaging Probe Panometry in Patients With Achalasia Undergoing Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy: A Single-center Experience.

Li-Chang Hsing, KyungMin Choi, Kee Wook Jung, Segyeong Joo, Nayoung Kim, Ga Hee Kim, Hee Kyong Na, Ji Yong Ahn, JeongHoon Lee, Do Hoon Kim and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Modern Achalasia: Diagnosis, Classification, and Treatment.Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility · 2023
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Li-Chang HsingDepartments of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
KyungMin ChoiDepartments of Biomedical Engineering, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Kee Wook JungDepartments of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Segyeong JooDepartments of Biomedical Engineering, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Nayoung KimDepartments of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Ga Hee KimDepartments of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Hee Kyong NaDepartments of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Ji Yong AhnDepartments of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
JeongHoon LeeDepartments of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Do Hoon KimDepartments of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Kee Don ChoiDepartments of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Ho June SongDepartments of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Gin Hyug LeeDepartments of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Hwoon-Yong JungDepartments of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background/Aims: We evaluated the clinical significance and prognostic power of functional luminal imaging probe (FLIP) panometry in patients with achalasia treated with peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM), and examined the clinical parameters associated with symptomatic improvement and the presence of contractility (POC) following POEM. Methods: We reviewed the electronic medical records of patients with achalasia treated with FLIP panometry and POEM at a tertiary teaching hospital in Seoul, Republic of Korea. Follow-up examination was composed of esophageal manometry and questionnaires on symptoms. We analyzed the FLIP data by interpolating using the cubic spline method in MATLAB. Results: We retrospectively analyzed 33 men and 35 women (mean age: 52 ± 17 years), of whom 14, 39, and 15 patients were diagnosed with achalasia types I, II, and III, respectively. The FLIP panometry diagnoses were reduced esophagogastric junction opening (REO) with a retrograde contractile response (n = 43); REO with an absent contractile response (n = 5); REO with a normal contractile response (n = 11); and a retrograde contractile response (n = 9). Overall, the patients showed improvements in Eckardt scores following POEM from 6.48 ± 2.20 to 1.16 ± 1.15 ( Conclusion: While FLIP panometry was not significantly associated with the clinical course of achalasia, FLIP panometry was associated with POC following POEM and may complement manometry in the functional evaluation of esophageal motility disorders.

Indexed as

Esophageal achalasiaManometryMyotomy

Identifiers

PMID35799241
PMCPMC9274461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.