Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35799209›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of emergency surgery : WJES2022

Do we need repeated CT imaging in uncomplicated blunt renal injuries? Experiences of a high-volume urological trauma centre.

Andrea Katharina Lindner, Anna Katharina Luger, Josef Fritz, Johannes Stäblein, Christian Radmayr, Friedrich Aigner, Peter Rehder, Gennadi Tulchiner, Wolfgang Horninger, Renate Pichler

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of emergency surgery : WJES, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andrea Katharina LindnerDepartment of Urology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstraße 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Anna Katharina LugerDepartment of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Josef FritzDepartment of Medical Statistics, Informatics and Health Economics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Johannes StäbleinDepartment of Urology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstraße 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Christian RadmayrDepartment of Urology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstraße 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Friedrich AignerDepartment of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Peter RehderDepartment of Urology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstraße 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Gennadi TulchinerDepartment of Urology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstraße 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Wolfgang HorningerDepartment of Urology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstraße 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Renate PichlerDepartment of Urology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstraße 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria. Renate.Pichler@i-med.ac.at.
Innsbruck Medical University · ATUniversität Innsbruck · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrent guidelines recommend repeat computed tomography (CT) imaging in high-grade blunt renal injury within 48-96 h, yet diagnostic value and clinical significance remain controversial. The aim of this work was to determine the possible gain of CT re-imaging in uncomplicated patients with blunt renal trauma at 48 h after injury, presenting one of the largest case series.

methodsA retrospective database of patients admitted to our centre with isolated blunt renal trauma due to sporting injuries was analysed for a period of 20 years (2000-2020). We included only patients who underwent repeat imaging at 48 h after trauma irrespective of AAST renal injury grading (grade 1-5) and initial management. The primary outcome was intervention rates after CT imaging at 48 h in uncomplicated patients versus CT scan at the time of clinical symptoms.

resultsA total of 280 patients (mean age: 37.8 years; 244 (87.1%) male) with repeat CT after 48 h were included. 150 (53.6%) patients were classified as low-grade (grade 1-3) and 130 (46.4%) as high-grade (grade 4-5) trauma. Immediate intervention at trauma was necessary in 59 (21.1%) patients with high-grade injuries: minimally invasive therapy in 48 (81.4%) and open surgery in 11 (18.6%) patients, respectively. In only 16 (5.7%) cases, intervention was performed based on CT re-imaging at 48 h (low-grade vs. high-grade: 3.3% vs. 8.5%; p = 0.075). On the contrary, intervention rate due to clinical symptoms was 12.5% (n = 35). Onset of clinical progress was on average (range) 5.3 (1-17) days post trauma. High-grade trauma (odds ratio [OR]

conclusionOur data suggest that routine CT imaging 48 h post trauma can be safely omitted for patients with low- and high-grade blunt renal injury as long as they remain clinically stable. Patients with high-grade renal injury have the highest risk for clinical progress; thus, close surveillance should be considered especially in this group.

Indexed as

Trauma CentersWounds, NonpenetratingAdultFemaleHumansKidneyMaleRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedBlunt renal traumaNon-operative managementRepeat imagingSelected imagingSelective angioembolization

Identifiers

PMID35799209
PMCPMC9264658
OpenAlexW4284895606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.