Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35799185›Full record

ArticleBMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation2022

The impact of resistance exercise range of motion on the magnitude of upper-body post-activation performance enhancement.

Michał Krzysztofik, Robert Trybulski, Bartosz Trąbka, Dawid Perenc, Konrad Łuszcz, Adam Zajac, Dan Iulian Alexe, Tatiana Dobrescu, Cristina Elena Moraru

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Post-Isometric Back Squat Performance Enhancement of Squat and Countermovement Jump.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Michał KrzysztofikInstitute of Sport Sciences, The Jerzy Kukuczka Academy of Physical Education in Katowice, Mikołowska 72A str., 40-065, Katowice, Poland. m.krzysztofik@awf.katowice.pl.
Robert TrybulskiProvita Zory Medical Center, 44-240, Zory, Poland.
Bartosz TrąbkaFaculty of Physical Education, Gdansk University of Physical Education and Sport, 80-336, Gdansk, Poland.
Dawid PerencFaculty of Electrical Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, 44-100, Gliwice, Poland.
Konrad ŁuszczDepartment of Sports Training, The Jerzy Kukuczka Academy of Physical Education in Katowice, 40-065, Katowice, Poland.
Adam ZajacInstitute of Sport Sciences, The Jerzy Kukuczka Academy of Physical Education in Katowice, Mikołowska 72A str., 40-065, Katowice, Poland.
Dan Iulian AlexeFaculty of Movement, Sports and Health Sciences, Vasile Alecsandri University of Bacău, 600115, Bacau, Romania.
Tatiana DobrescuFaculty of Movement, Sports and Health Sciences, Vasile Alecsandri University of Bacău, 600115, Bacau, Romania.
Cristina Elena MoraruFaculty of Physical Education and Sport, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi, 700506, Iasi, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVarious studies have used different exercise protocols as post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE) stimulus; however, little attention has been given to the effects of exercise range of motion on the PAPE effect and subsequent performance enhancement. This study aimed to compare the PAPE responses induced by the bench press performed with different ranges of motion on subsequent bench press throw performance.

methodsTen resistance-trained males (age: 26 ± 3 years; body mass: 93.2 ± 9.4 kg; height: 181 ± 6 cm; experience in resistance training: 6.3 ± 2.4 years; relative bench press one-repetition maximum (1RM) 1.54 ± 0.2 kg/body mass) performed four experimental sessions consisting of a single set of the bench press at 80%1RM until mean barbell velocity dropped by 10% as the conditioning activity (CA) with a (1) standard, (2) cambered, (3) and reversed cambered barbell or a control condition in which the participants did not perform any CA. To assess the PAPE effect, single-sets of 2 repetitions of the bench press throw at 30%1RM were performed before and after the CA at the following time points: 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 min.

resultsThe two-way ANOVA (4 conditions × 2time points) showed a significant interaction for peak power (p < 0.001; η

conclusionsThe results of this study indicate that the range of motion of the CA has a significant impact on the magnitude of the PAPE response, and the greatest effect can be reached when the range of motion of the CA and the subsequent explosive task is similar.

Indexed as

Bench pressBench press throwConditioning activityPAPPAPEPost-activation potentiation

Identifiers

PMID35799185
PMCPMC9264649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.