Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35799121›Full record

Trial reportBMC public health2022

Stepped care to optimize pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) effectiveness in pregnant and postpartum women (SCOPE-PP) in South Africa: a randomized control trial.

Dvora Leah Joseph Davey, Kathryn Dovel, Susan Cleary, Nehaa Khadka, Nyiko Mashele, Miriam Silliman, Rufaro Mvududu, Dorothy C Nyemba, Thomas J Coates, Landon Myer

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05322629 (Stepped Care to Optimize PrEP Effectiveness in Pregnant and Postpartum Women), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05322629 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

Stepped Care to Optimize PrEP Effectiveness in Pregnant and Postpartum Women (SCOPE-PP) in South Africa

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, Los AngelesRan2022 to 2025Enrolled650ConditionsHivArmsPrEP adherence biofeedback, Standard of care counseling
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Implementation determinants of HIV Self-Testing among young sexual minority men.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Dvora Leah Joseph DaveyDepartment of Epidemiology, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA. djosephdavey@mednet.ucla.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-6290-9293
Kathryn DovelDivision of Infectious Diseases, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, 0833 Le Conte Ave, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
Susan ClearyDivision of Health Economics, School of Public Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Nehaa KhadkaDepartment of Epidemiology, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Nyiko MasheleDivision of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Miriam SillimanDepartment of Epidemiology, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Rufaro MvududuDivision of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Dorothy C NyembaDivision of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Thomas J CoatesDivision of Infectious Diseases, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, 0833 Le Conte Ave, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
Landon MyerDivision of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
University of Cape Town · ZAUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

UCLA Rapid, Relevant, Rigorous Implementation Science HubP30MH058107 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Sung-Jae Lee · 1997 to 2026
$53.5M
Stepped care to optimize PrEP effectiveness in pregnant and postpartum women (SCOPE-PP) in South AfricaR01HD106862 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI DVORA Leah JOSEPH DAVEY · 2021 to 2026
$2.7M
Evaluation of pre-exposure prophylaxis cascade in pregnant and breastfeeding women in Cape Town, South AfricaK01TW011187 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI JOSEPH DAVEY, DVORA LEAH · 2018 to 2022
$698k
FIC NIH HHS K01 TW011187NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD106862NIMH NIH HHS P30 MH058107
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHIV incidence among pregnant and postpartum women remains high in South Africa. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use remains suboptimal in this population, particularly during the postpartum period when women's engagement with routine clinic visits outside PrEP decreases. Key barriers to sustained PrEP use include the need for ongoing contact with the health facility and suboptimal counseling around effective PrEP use.

methodsStepped Care to Optimize PrEP Effectiveness in Pregnant and Postpartum women (SCOPE-PP), is a two-stepped unblinded, individually randomized controlled trial (RCT) that aims to optimize peripartum and postpartum PrEP use by providing a stepped package of evidence-based interventions. We will enroll 650 pregnant women (> 25 weeks pregnant) who access PrEP at a busy antenatal clinic in Cape Town at the time of recruitment and follow them for 15 months. We will enroll and individually randomize pregnant women > 16 years who are not living with HIV who are either on PrEP or interested in starting PrEP during pregnancy. In step 1, we will evaluate the impact of enhanced adherence counselling and biofeedback (using urine tenofovir tests for biofeedback) and rapid PrEP collection (to reduce time required) on PrEP use in early peripartum compared to standard of care (SOC) (n = 325 per arm). The primary outcome is PrEP persistence per urine tenofovir levels and dried blood spots of tenofovir diphosphate (TFV-DP) after 6-months. The second step will enroll and individually randomize participants from Step 1 who discontinue taking PrEP or have poor persistence in Step 1 but want to continue PrEP. Step 2 will test the impact of enhanced counseling and biofeedback plus rapid PrEP collection compared to community PrEP delivery with HIV self-testing on PrEP use (n = up to 325 postpartum women). The primary outcome is PrEP continuation and persistence 6-months following second randomization (~ 9-months postpartum). Finally, we will estimate the cost effectiveness of SCOPE-PP vs. SOC per primary outcomes and disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) averted in both Step 1 and 2 using micro-costing with trial- and model-based economic evaluation. DISCUSSION: This study will provide novel insights into optimal strategies for delivering PrEP to peripartum and postpartum women in this high-incidence setting.

trial registrationNCT05322629 : Date of registration: April 12, 2022.

Indexed as

Anti-HIV AgentsHIV InfectionsPre-Exposure ProphylaxisFemaleHumansPostpartum PeriodPregnancyPregnant PeopleSouth AfricaTenofovirAnti-HIV AgentsTenofovirBreastfeedingEconomic evaluationPersistencePMTCTPre-exposure prophylaxisPregnantPrEPProtocolRandomized control trialSouth Africa

Identifiers

PMID35799121
PMCPMC9264672
OpenAlexW4284893451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.