Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35799080›Full record

ArticleAdvances in therapy2022

Reduced Healthcare Resource Utilization in Patients with Opioid Use Disorder in the 12 Months After Initiation of a Prescription Digital Therapeutic.

Fulton F Velez, Kathryn P Anastassopoulos, Samuel Colman, Neel Shah, Laura Kauffman, Sean M Murphy, Charles Ruetsch, Yuri A Maricich

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Fulton F VelezPear Therapeutics (US), Inc., 200 State St., Boston, MA, 02109, USA. fulton.velez@peartherapeutics.com.
Kathryn P AnastassopoulosMarket Access Consulting, Labcorp Drug Development, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
Samuel ColmanMarket Access Consulting, Labcorp Drug Development, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
Neel ShahPear Therapeutics (US), Inc., 200 State St., Boston, MA, 02109, USA.
Laura KauffmanMarket Access Consulting, Labcorp Drug Development, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
Sean M MurphyDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
Charles RuetschHealth Analytics, Columbia, MD, USA.
Yuri A MaricichPear Therapeutics (US), Inc., 200 State St., Boston, MA, 02109, USA.
Pear Therapeutics (United States) · USAccess to Wholistic and Productive Living Institute · USCornell University · USLabCorp (United States) · USTruven Health Analytics (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsreSET-O, an FDA-authorized prescription digital therapeutic (PDT) delivering cognitive behavioral therapy and contingency management to patients with opioid u

methodsRetrospective analysis of healthcare claims data compared all-cause HCRU (across hospital facility encounters [sum of inpatient stays, treat-and-release emergency department [ED] visits, partial hospitalizations, and hospital outpatient department visits] and clinician services [procedure categories]) after PDT initiation (index) between reSET-O patients and controls. Overall and Medicaid-specific differences in HCRU, costs, and buprenorphine adherence were evaluated.

findingsCohorts included 901 reSET-O patients (median age 36 years, 62.4% female, 73.9% Medicaid) and 978 controls (median age 38 years, 51.1% female, 65.4% Medicaid). Compared to the control group, the reSET-O group experienced 12% fewer total unique hospital encounters (non-significant), driven by 28% fewer inpatient stays (IRR 0.72; 95% CI 0.55-0.96; P = 0.02), 56% fewer hospital readmissions [IRR 0.44; 95% CI 0.20-0.93; P = 0.033]), and 7% fewer ED visits (IRR 0.93; 95% CI 0.79-1.09; P = 0.386). Total clinician services increased by 1391 events versus controls. Differences were greater among the Medicaid patients. Adjustment for concomitant baseline substance use and mental health disorders resulted in similar HCRU incidence rate ratios. Changes in all-cause HCRU drove per-patient per-year cost differences of - $2791 versus controls (- $3832 versus Medicaid controls). Adjusted mean medication possession ratio was 0.848 (SE 0.0118) at 12 months for reSET-O patients, which was significantly higher than controls (0.761 [SE 0.0108]; P < 0.001).

conclusionsUse of reSET-O is associated with significant and durable real-world reductions in ED and inpatient (including readmissions) utilization, reduced net costs, and increased clinician services and buprenorphine adherence. Differences in costs versus controls were greatest among Medicaid patients. INFOGRAPHIC.

Indexed as

BuprenorphineOpioid-Related DisordersAdultFemaleHealth Care CostsHumansMalePatient Acceptance of Health CarePrescriptionsRetrospective StudiesUnited StatesBuprenorphineCommunity reinforcement approachContingency managementDigital therapeuticDTxHealthcare resource utilizationOpioid use disorderPDTPrescription digital therapeuticreSET-O

Identifiers

PMID35799080
PMCPMC9402736
OpenAlexW4284683041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.