Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35799078›Full record

ArticleBulletin of mathematical biology2022

A Mathematical Model of Salivary Gland Duct Cells.

Shan Su, John Rugis, Amanda Wahl, Sam Doak, Yating Li, Vinod Suresh, David Yule, James Sneyd

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bulletin of mathematical biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Neuronal and hormonal control of CaThe Journal of physiology · 2024
    Review
  4. A mathematical model of ENaC and Slc26a6 regulation by CFTR in salivary gland ducts.American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Shan SuDepartment of Mathematics, University of Auckland, 38 Princess Street, Auckland, 1010, New Zealand. ssu655@aucklanduni.ac.nz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6492-2619
John RugisDepartment of Mathematics, University of Auckland, 38 Princess Street, Auckland, 1010, New Zealand.
Amanda WahlSchool of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Rochester, 601 Elmwood Ave, Rochester, NY, 14642, USA.
Sam DoakDepartment of Mathematics, University of Auckland, 38 Princess Street, Auckland, 1010, New Zealand.
Yating LiDepartment of Mathematics, University of Auckland, 38 Princess Street, Auckland, 1010, New Zealand.
Vinod SureshAuckland Biomedical Engineering Institute, University of Auckland, 70 Symonds Street, Auckland, 1010, New Zealand.
David YuleSchool of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Rochester, 601 Elmwood Ave, Rochester, NY, 14642, USA.
James SneydDepartment of Mathematics, University of Auckland, 38 Princess Street, Auckland, 1010, New Zealand.
University of Auckland · NZUniversity of Rochester · US

Funding

An experimental/computational approach for understanding salivary fluid secretionR01DE019245 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI David I Yule · 2008 to 2026
$9.7M
Elucidating the Mechanisms of Salivary Gland Dysfunction Following Gamma-Irradiation Utilizing an Experimental and Computational ApproachF31DE030670 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI WAHL, AMANDA MICHELLE · 2021 to 2023
$132k
NIDCR NIH HHS F31 DE030670NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE019245
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Saliva is produced in two stages in the salivary glands: the secretion of primary saliva by the acinus and the modification of saliva composition to final saliva by the intercalated and striated ducts. In order to understand the saliva modification process, we develop a mathematical model for the salivary gland duct. The model utilises the realistic 3D structure of the duct reconstructed from an image stack of gland tissue. Immunostaining results show that TMEM16A and aquaporin are expressed in the intercalated duct cells and that ENaC is not. Based on this, the model predicts that the intercalated duct does not absorb Na[Formula: see text] and Cl[Formula: see text] like the striated duct but secretes a small amount of water instead. The input to the duct model is the time-dependent primary saliva generated by an acinar cell model. Our duct model produces final saliva output that agrees with the experimental measurements at various stimulation levels. It also shows realistic biological features such as duct cell volume, cellular concentrations and membrane potentials. Simplification of the model by omission of all detailed 3D structures of the duct makes a negligible difference to the final saliva output. This shows that saliva production is not sensitive to structural variation of the duct.

Indexed as

Mathematical ConceptsModels, BiologicalAcinar CellsSalivaSalivary Glands3D reconstructionImmunostainingIon transportersMathematical modellingSalivary gland

Identifiers

PMID35799078
PMCPMC9262821
OpenAlexW4284884862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.