Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35798819›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Comparative transcriptome analysis of synthetic and common wheat in response to salt stress.

Rio Nakayama, Mohammad Taheb Safi, Waisuddin Ahmadzai, Kazuhiro Sato, Kanako Kawaura

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Molecular Cytological Analysis and Specific Marker Development in Wheat-International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rio NakayamaKihara Institute for Biological Research, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, 244-0813, Japan.
Mohammad Taheb SafiKihara Institute for Biological Research, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, 244-0813, Japan.
Waisuddin AhmadzaiKihara Institute for Biological Research, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, 244-0813, Japan.
Kazuhiro SatoInstitute of Plant Science and Resources, Okayama University, Kurashiki, 710-0046, Japan.
Kanako KawauraKihara Institute for Biological Research, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, 244-0813, Japan. kawaura@yokohama-cu.ac.jp.
Kihara Institute for Biological Research · JPYokohama City University · JPOkayama University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Salt stress reduces wheat yield. Therefore, improvement for enhanced salt stress tolerance is necessary for stable production. To understand the molecular mechanism of salt tolerance in common wheat and synthetic hexaploid (SH) wheat, RNA sequencing was performed on the roots of three wheat lines salt-tolerant SH wheat, salt-tolerant common wheat, and salt-sensitive common wheat. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in response to salt stress were characterized using gene ontology enrichment analysis. Salt tolerance in common wheat has been suggested to be mainly regulated by the activation of transporters. In contrast, salt tolerance in SH wheat is enhanced through up-regulation of the reactive oxygen species signaling pathway, other unknown pathways, and different ERF transcription factors. These results indicate that salt tolerance is differentially controlled between common wheat and SH wheat. Furthermore, QTL analysis was performed using the F

Indexed as

Plant BreedingTriticumGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, PlantSalt StressSalt ToleranceTranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID35798819
PMCPMC9262916
OpenAlexW4284694928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.