Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35798761›Full record

ArticleScientific data2022

Food webs for three burn severities after wildfire in the Eldorado National Forest, California.

John P McLaughlin, John W Schroeder, Angela M White, Kate Culhane, Haley E Mirts, Gina L Tarbill, Laura Sire, Matt Page, Elijah J Baker, Max Moritz and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

John P McLaughlinDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106-6150, USA. johnmclaughlin@ucsb.edu.
John W SchroederDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106-6150, USA.
Angela M WhiteUSDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Davis, CA, 95618, USA.
Kate CulhaneDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106-6150, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6739-2999
Haley E MirtsDepartment of Wildlife, Fish, and Conservation Biology, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
Gina L TarbillDepartment of Wildlife, Fish, and Conservation Biology, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
Laura SireDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106-6150, USA.
Matt PageDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106-6150, USA.
Elijah J BakerEnvironmental Studies Program, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106-4160, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8335-0051
Max MoritzUniversity of California Cooperative Extension, Bren School of Environmental Science & Management, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106-5131, USA.
Justin BrasharesDepartment of Environmental Science, Policy, & Management, University of California Berkeley, 130 Mulford Hall #3114, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA.
Hillary S YoungDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106-6150, USA.
Rahel SollmannDepartment of Wildlife, Fish, and Conservation Biology, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wildfire dynamics are changing around the world and understanding their effects on ecological communities and landscapes is urgent and important. We report detailed food webs for unburned, low-to-moderate and high severity burned habitats three years post-fire in the Eldorado National Forest, California. The cumulative cross-habitat food web contains 3,084 ontogenetic stages (nodes) or plant parts comprising 849 species (including 107 primary producers, 634 invertebrates, 94 vertebrates). There were 178,655 trophic interactions between these nodes. We provide information on taxonomy, body size, biomass density and trophic interactions under each of the three burn conditions. We detail 19 sampling methods deployed across 27 sites (nine in each burn condition) used to estimate the richness, body size, abundance and biomass density estimates in the node lists. We provide the R code and raw data to estimate summarized node densities and assign trophic links.

Identifiers

PMID35798761
PMCPMC9262949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.