Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35798448›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American College of Cardiology2022

Trends and Disparities in Cardiometabolic Health Among U.S. Adults, 1999-2018.

Meghan O'Hearn, Brianna N Lauren, John B Wong, David D Kim, Dariush Mozaffarian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 105 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
105citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

105 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Nutrition and Culinary Education in Food Is Medicine Interventions: A Scoping Review.Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

45 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Meghan O'HearnFriedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. Electronic address: meghan.o_hearn@tufts.edu.
Brianna N LaurenFriedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
John B WongTufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Tufts Medical Center, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
David D KimTufts Medical Center, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Dariush MozaffarianFriedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

Cost-Effectiveness of Health System and State-Level Strategies to Improve Diet and Reduce Cardiometabolic DiseasesR01HL115189 · NHLBI · TUFTS UNIVERSITY BOSTON · PI DARIUSH MOZAFFARIAN · 2013 to 2026
$8.2M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL115189
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFew studies have assessed U.S. cardiometabolic health trends-optimal levels of multiple risk factors and absence of clinical cardiovascular disease (CVD)-or its impact on health disparities.

objectivesThe purpose of this study was to investigate U.S. trends in optimal cardiometabolic health from 1999 to 2018.

methodsWe assessed proportions of adults with optimal cardiometabolic health, based on adiposity, blood glucose, blood lipids, blood pressure, and clinical CVD; and optimal, intermediate, and poor levels of each component among 55,081 U.S. adults in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

resultsIn 2017-2018, only 6.8% (95% CI: 5.4%-8.1%) of U.S. adults had optimal cardiometabolic health, declining from 1999-2000 (P trend = 0.02). Among components of cardiometabolic health, the largest declines were for adiposity (optimal levels: 33.8%-24.0%; poor levels: 47.7%-61.9%) and glucose (optimal levels: 59.4%-36.9%; poor levels: 8.6%-13.7%) (P trend <0.001 for each). Optimal levels of blood lipids increased from 29.9%-37.0%, whereas poor decreased from 28.3%-14.7% (P trend <0.001). Trends over time for blood pressure and CVD were smaller. Disparities by age, sex, education, and race/ethnicity were evident in all years, and generally worsened over time. By 2017-2018, prevalence of optimal cardiometabolic health was lower among Americans with lower (5.0% [95% CI: 2.8%-7.2%]) vs higher education (10.3% [95% CI: 7.6%-13.0%]); and among Mexican American (3.2% [95% CI: 1.4%-4.9%]) vs non-Hispanic White (8.4% [95% CI: 6.3%-10.4%]) adults.

conclusionsBetween 1999 and 2000 and 2017 and 2018, U.S. cardiometabolic health has been poor and worsening, with only 6.8% of adults having optimal cardiometabolic health, and disparities by age, sex, education, and race/ethnicity. These novel findings inform the need for nationwide clinical and public health interventions to improve cardiometabolic health and health equity.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesAdultBlood PressureCross-Sectional StudiesHumansMexican AmericansNutrition SurveysObesityRisk FactorsUnited Statescardiometabolic healthdiabeteshealth disparitiesmetabolic syndromeobesity

Identifiers

PMID35798448
PMCPMC10475326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.