ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2022
Quantifying Brain Iron in Hereditary Hemochromatosis Using R2* and Susceptibility Mapping.
Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Does quantitative susceptibility mapping elucidate age-related alterations in deep gray matter iron deposition? A systematic review.Radiological physics and technology · 2026Review
- Feasibility study on QSM and R2* mapping for quantitative evaluation of iron deposition and ovarian function assessment in endometriotic ovarian cysts.La Radiologia medica · 2026Article
- Magnetic iron-oxide nanoparticles in the brain connected to alcohol-associated liver disease.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Phospholipids and peroxisomes in ferroptosis: the therapeutic target of acupuncture regulating vascular cognitive impairment and dementia.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeBrain iron dyshomeostasis is increasingly recognized as an important contributor to neurodegeneration. Hereditary hemochromatosis is the most commonly inherited disorder of systemic iron overload. Although there is an increasing interest in excessive brain iron deposition, there is a paucity of evidence showing changes in brain iron exceeding that in healthy controls. Quantitative susceptibility mapping and R2* mapping are established MR imaging techniques that we used to noninvasively quantify brain iron in subjects with hereditary hemochromatosis. MATERIALS AND
methodsFifty-two patients with hereditary hemochromatosis and 47 age- and sex-matched healthy controls were imaged using a multiecho gradient-echo sequence at 3T. Quantitative susceptibility mapping and R2* data were generated, and regions within the deep gray matter were manually segmented. Mean susceptibility and R2* relaxation rates were calculated for each region, and iron content was compared between the groups.
resultsWe noted elevated iron levels in patients with hereditary hemochromatosis compared with healthy controls using both R2* and QSM methods in the caudate nucleus, putamen, pulvinar thalamus, red nucleus, and dentate nucleus. Additionally, the substantia nigra showed increased susceptibility while the thalamus showed an increased R2* relaxation rate compared with healthy controls, respectively.
conclusionsBoth quantitative susceptibility mapping and R2* showed abnormal levels of brain iron in subjects with hereditary hemochromatosis compared with controls. Quantitative susceptibility mapping and R2* can be acquired in a single MR imaging sequence and are complementary in quantifying deep gray matter iron.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.